Computers
Read books online Ā» Computers Ā» Hacker Crackdown by Bruce Sterling (the reader ebook txt) šŸ“–

Book online Ā«Hacker Crackdown by Bruce Sterling (the reader ebook txt) šŸ“–Ā». Author Bruce Sterling



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 54
Go to page:
their lives to improving this vast nation-spanning machine; over years, whole human lives, they had watched it improve and grow. It was like a great technological temple. They were an elite, and they knew itā€” even if others did not; in fact, they felt even more powerful BECAUSE others did not understand.

The deep attraction of this sensation of elite technical power should never be underestimated. ā€œTechnical powerā€ is not for everybody; for many people it simply has no charm at all. But for some people, it becomes the core of their lives. For a few, it is overwhelming, obsessive; it becomes something close to an addiction. Peopleā€”especially clever teenage boys whose lives are otherwise mostly powerless and put-uponā€”love this sensation of secret power, and are willing to do all sorts of amazing things to achieve it. The technical POWER of electronics has motivated many strange acts detailed in this book, which would otherwise be inexplicable.

So Bell had power beyond mere capitalism. The Bell service ethos worked, and was often propagandized, in a rather saccharine fashion. Over the decades, people slowly grew tired of this. And then, openly impatient with it. By the early 1980s, Ma Bell was to find herself with scarcely a real friend in the world. Vailā€™s industrial socialism had become hopelessly out-of-fashion politically. Bell would be punished for that. And that punishment would fall harshly upon the people of the telephone community.

 

In 1983, Ma Bell was dismantled by federal court action. The pieces of Bell are now separate corporate entities. The core of the company became AT&T Communications, and also AT&T Industries (formerly Western Electric, Bellā€™s manufacturing arm). AT&T Bell Labs become Bell Communications Research, Bellcore. Then there are the Regional Bell Operating Companies, or RBOCs, pronounced ā€œarbocks.ā€

Bell was a titan and even these regional chunks are gigantic enterprises: Fortune 50 companies with plenty of wealth and power behind them. But the clean lines of ā€œOne Policy, One System, Universal Serviceā€ have been shattered, apparently forever.

The ā€œOne Policyā€ of the early Reagan Administration was to shatter a system that smacked of noncompetitive socialism. Since that time, there has been no real telephone ā€œpolicyā€ on the federal level. Despite the breakup, the remnants of Bell have never been set free to compete in the open marketplace.

The RBOCs are still very heavily regulated, but not from the top. Instead, they struggle politically, economically and legally, in what seems an endless turmoil, in a patchwork of overlapping federal and state jurisdictions. Increasingly, like other major American corporations, the RBOCs are becoming multinational, acquiring important commercial interests in Europe, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim. But this, too, adds to their legal and political predicament.

The people of what used to be Ma Bell are not happy about their fate. They feel illused. They might have been grudgingly willing to make a full transition to the free market; to become just companies amid other companies. But this never happened. Instead, AT&T and the RBOCS (ā€œthe Baby Bellsā€) feel themselves wrenched from side to side by state regulators, by Congress, by the FCC, and especially by the federal court of Judge Harold Greene, the magistrate who ordered the Bell breakup and who has been the de facto czar of American telecommunications ever since 1983. Bell people feel that they exist in a kind of paralegal limbo today. They donā€™t understand whatā€™s demanded of them. If itā€™s ā€œservice,ā€ why arenā€™t they treated like a public service? And if itā€™s money, then why arenā€™t they free to compete for it? No one seems to know, really. Those who claim to know keep changing their minds. Nobody in authority seems willing to grasp the nettle for once and all.

Telephone people from other countries are amazed by the American telephone system today. Not that it works so well; for nowadays even the French telephone system works, more or less. They are amazed that the American telephone system STILL works AT ALL, under these strange conditions.

Bellā€™s ā€œOne Systemā€ of long-distance service is now only about eighty percent of a system, with the remainder held by Sprint, MCI, and the midget long-distance companies. Ugly wars over dubious corporate practices such as ā€œslammingā€ (an underhanded method of snitching clients from rivals) break out with some regularity in the realm of long-distance service. The battle to break Bellā€™s long-distance monopoly was long and ugly, and since the breakup the battlefield has not become much prettier. AT&Tā€™s famous shame-and-blame advertisements, which emphasized the shoddy work and purported ethical shadiness of their competitors, were much remarked on for their studied psychological cruelty.

There is much bad blood in this industry, and much long-treasured resentment. AT&Tā€™s post-breakup corporate logo, a striped sphere, is known in the industry as the ā€œDeath Starā€ (a reference from the movie STAR WARS, in which the ā€œDeath Starā€ was the spherical high-tech fortress of the harsh-breathing imperial ultra-baddie, Darth Vader.) Even AT&T employees are less than thrilled by the Death Star. A popular (though banned) T-shirt among AT&T employees bears the old-fashioned Bell logo of the Bell System, plus the newfangled striped sphere, with the before-and-after comments: ā€œThis is your brainā€”This is your brain on drugs!ā€ AT&T made a very well-financed and determined effort to break into the personal computer market; it was disastrous, and telco computer experts are derisively known by their competitors as ā€œthe pole-climbers.ā€ AT&T and the Baby Bell arbocks still seem to have few friends.

Under conditions of sharp commercial competition, a crash like that of January 15, 1990 was a major embarrassment to AT&T. It was a direct blow against their much-treasured reputation for reliability. Within days of the crash AT&Tā€™s Chief Executive Officer, Bob Allen, officially apologized, in terms of deeply pained humility:

 

ā€œAT&T had a major service disruption last Monday. We didnā€™t live up to our own standards of quality, and we didnā€™t live up to yours. Itā€™s as simple as that. And thatā€™s not acceptable to us. Or to youā€¦. We understand how much people have come to depend upon AT&T service, so our AT&T Bell Laboratories scientists and our network engineers are doing everything possible to guard against a recurrenceā€¦. We know thereā€™s no way to make up for the inconvenience this problem may have caused you.ā€

 

Mr Allenā€™s ā€œopen letter to customersā€ was printed in lavish ads all over the country: in the WALL STREET JOURNAL, USA TODAY, NEW YORK TIMES, LOS ANGELES TIMES, CHICAGO TRIBUNE, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE EXAMINER, BOSTON GLOBE, DALLAS MORNING NEWS, DETROIT FREE PRESS, WASHINGTON POST, HOUSTON CHRONICLE, CLEVELAND PLAIN DEALER, ATLANTA JOURNAL CONSTITUTION, MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE, ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS DISPATCH, SEATTLE TIME/POST INTELLIGENCER, TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE, MIAMI HERALD, PITTSBURGH PRESS, ST. LOUIS POST DISPATCH, DENVER POST, PHOENIX REPUBLIC GAZETTE and TAMPA TRIBUNE.

In another press release, AT&T went to some pains to suggest that this ā€œsoftware glitchā€ MIGHT have happened just as easily to MCI, although, in fact, it hadnā€™t. (MCIā€™s switching software was quite different from AT&Tā€™sā€”though not necessarily any safer.) AT&T also announced their plans to offer a rebate of service on Valentineā€™s Day to make up for the loss during the Crash.

 

ā€œEvery technical resource available, including Bell Labs scientists and engineers, has been devoted to assuring it will not occur again,ā€ the public was told. They were further assured that ā€œThe chances of a recurrence are smallā€”a problem of this magnitude never occurred before.ā€

 

In the meantime, however, police and corporate security maintained their own suspicions about ā€œthe chances of recurrenceā€ and the real reason why a ā€œproblem of this magnitudeā€ had appeared, seemingly out of nowhere. Police and security knew for a fact that hackers of unprecedented sophistication were illegally entering, and reprogramming, certain digital switching stations. Rumors of hidden ā€œvirusesā€ and secret ā€œlogic bombsā€ in the switches ran rampant in the underground, with much chortling over AT&Tā€™s predicament, and idle speculation over what unsung hacker genius was responsible for it. Some hackers, including police informants, were trying hard to finger one another as the true culprits of the Crash.

Telco people found little comfort in objectivity when they contemplated these possibilities. It was just too close to the bone for them; it was embarrassing; it hurt so much, it was hard even to talk about.

There has always been thieving and misbehavior in the phone system. There has always been trouble with the rival independents, and in the local loops. But to have such trouble in the core of the system, the long-distance switching stations, is a horrifying affair. To telco people, this is all the difference between finding roaches in your kitchen and big horrid sewer-rats in your bedroom.

From the outside, to the average citizen, the telcos still seem gigantic and impersonal. The American public seems to regard them as something akin to Soviet apparats. Even when the telcos do their best corporate-citizen routine, subsidizing magnet high-schools and sponsoring news-shows on public television, they seem to win little except public suspicion.

But from the inside, all this looks very different. Thereā€™s harsh competition. A legal and political system that seems baffled and bored, when not actively hostile to telco interests. Thereā€™s a loss of morale, a deep sensation of having somehow lost the upper hand. Technological change has caused a loss of data and revenue to other, newer forms of transmission. Thereā€™s theft, and new forms of theft, of growing scale and boldness and sophistication. With all these factors, it was no surprise to see the telcos, large and small, break out in a litany of bitter complaint.

In late ā€˜88 and throughout 1989, telco representatives grew shrill in their complaints to those few American law enforcement officials who make it their business to try to understand what telephone people are talking about. Telco security officials had discovered the computer-hacker underground, infiltrated it thoroughly, and become deeply alarmed at its growing expertise. Here they had found a target that was not only loathsome on its face, but clearly ripe for counterattack.

Those bitter rivals: AT&T, MCI and Sprintā€”and a crowd of Baby Bells: PacBell, Bell South, Southwestern Bell, NYNEX, USWest, as well as the Bell research consortium Bellcore, and the independent long-distance carrier Mid-Americanā€”all were to have their role in the great hacker dragnet of 1990. After years of being battered and pushed around, the telcos had, at least in a small way, seized the initiative again. After years of turmoil, telcos and government officials were once again to work smoothly in concert in defense of the System. Optimism blossomed; enthusiasm grew on all sides; the prospective taste of vengeance was sweet.

 

From the beginningā€”even before the crackdown had a name ā€”secrecy was a big problem. There were many good reasons for secrecy in the hacker crackdown. Hackers and code-thieves were wily prey, slinking back to their bedrooms and basements and destroying vital incriminating evidence at the first hint of trouble. Furthermore, the crimes themselves were heavily technical and difficult to describe, even to policeā€”much less to the general public.

When such crimes HAD been described intelligibly to the public, in the past, that very publicity had tended to INCREASE the crimes enormously. Telco officials, while painfully aware of the vulnerabilities of their systems, were anxious not to publicize those weaknesses. Experience showed them that those weaknesses, once discovered, would be pitilessly exploited by tens of thousands of peopleā€”not only by professional grifters and by underground hackers and phone phreaks, but by many otherwise more-or-less honest everyday folks, who regarded stealing service from the faceless, soulless ā€œPhone Companyā€ as a kind of harmless indoor sport. When it came to protecting their interests, telcos had long since given up on general public sympathy for ā€œthe Voice with a Smile.ā€ Nowadays the telcoā€™s ā€œVoiceā€ was very likely to be a computerā€™s; and the American public showed much less of the proper respect and gratitude due the fine public service bequeathed them by Dr. Bell and Mr. Vail. The more efficient,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 54
Go to page:

Free ebook Ā«Hacker Crackdown by Bruce Sterling (the reader ebook txt) šŸ“–Ā» - read online now

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet. You can be the first!
Add a comment