Have you ever thought about what fiction is? Probably, such a question may seem surprising: and so everything is clear. Every person throughout his life has to repeatedly create the works he needs for specific purposes - statements, autobiographies, dictations - using not gypsum or clay, not musical notes, not paints, but just a word. At the same time, almost every person will be very surprised if he is told that he thereby created a work of fiction, which is very different from visual art, music and sculpture making. However, everyone understands that a student's essay or dictation is fundamentally different from novels, short stories, news that are created by professional writers. In the works of professionals there is the most important difference - excogitation. But, oddly enough, in a school literature course, you don’t realize the full power of fiction. So using our website in your free time discover fiction for yourself. Look at that by - (read ebook pdf .txt) 📖
- Author: -
- Performer: -
Book online «Look at that by - (read ebook pdf .txt) 📖». Author -
- You mean to say that the men’s hello only counts as one?
- You must be a mind reader.
Simos Panopoulos - Look at that
147
sequence of pusillanimity, which the unknown woman exacerbated by playing dumb, was merely the reason. Its cause – an equation with numerous unknowns and one constant – the writing, whose resolution needed an iron discipline.
Christening, nonetheless, Deus ex machina someone who in appearance was a “goddess” only inasmuch as the role demanded, and event a fact where apparently absolutely nothing had happened, was, on any occa-sion, only human.
1) Stop burdening the novel with a bunch of trinkets as if it were a Christmas tree.
2) + after-effect of faintheartedness
- It’s as if you’re telling the reader to eat it all up just be-cause it really happened to you.
- Why, is it any better when the reader eats up whatever surreal crap others serve up and thanks them on top of it?
Simos Panopoulos - Look at that
148
Chapter 21
Look at that, first and foremost, would be, although still up for discussion, its title.
Simos Panourgias, secondly (even though he was still weighing his options), would be his pseudonym since yes, if it was meant to be published, he would pub-lish it under a pseudonym, and there was no room for negotiation. Why under a pseudonym? For no other reason of course, and here we are dead positive, than to maintain his anonymity. And why was it so impera-tive to maintain it? Well, in order, we guess, to protect himself
Comments (0)