The Murder on the Links by Agatha Christie (read novel full TXT) đ
- Author: Agatha Christie
- Performer: -
Book online «The Murder on the Links by Agatha Christie (read novel full TXT) đ». Author Agatha Christie
âI do not see that you can fix that definitelyâunless you question Mademoiselle Dabreuil again.â
âThere is no need. I am sure of it. And if you do not see that, you see nothing, Hastings!â
I looked at him for a moment.
âOf course! I am an idiot. If the tramp was Georges Conneau, it was after the stormy interview with him that Mr. Renauld apprehended danger. He sent away the chauffeur, Masters, whom he suspected of being in the otherâs pay, he wired to his son, and sent for you.â
A faint smile crossed Poirotâs lips.
âYou do not think it strange that he should use exactly the same expressions in his letter as Madame Renauld used later in her story? If the mention of Santiago was a blind, why should Renauld speak of it, andâwhat is moreâsend his son there?â
âIt is puzzling, I admit, but perhaps we shall find some explanation later. We come now to the evening, and the visit of the mysterious lady. I confess that that fairly baffles me, unless it was Madame Daubreuil, as Françoise all along maintained.â
Poirot shook his head.
âMy friend, my friend, where are your wits wandering? Remember the fragment of cheque, and the fact that the name Bella Duveen was faintly familiar to Stonor, and I think we may take it for granted that Bella Duveen is the full name of Jackâs unknown correspondent, and that it was she who came to the Villa GeneviĂšve that night. Whether she intended to see Jack, or whether she meant all along to appeal to his father we cannot be certain, but I think we may assume that this is what occurred. She produced her claim upon Jack, probably showed letters that he had written her, and the older man tried to buy her off by writing a cheque. This she indignantly tore up. The terms of her letter are those of a woman genuinely in love, and she would probably deeply resent being offered money. In the end he got rid of her, and here the words that he used are significant.â
âââYes, yes, but for Godâs sake go now,âââ I repeated. âThey seem to me a little vehement, perhaps, that is all.â
âThat is enough. He was desperately anxious for the girl to go. Why? Not only because the interview was unpleasant. No, it was the time that was slipping by, and for some reason time was precious.â
âWhy should it be?â I asked, bewildered.
âThat is what we ask ourselves. Why should it be? But later we have the incident of the wrist watchâwhich again shows us that time plays a very important part in the crime. We are now fast approaching the actual drama. It is half-past ten when Bella Duveen leaves, and by the evidence of the wrist watch we know that the crime was committed, or at any rate that it was staged, before twelve oâclock. We have reviewed all the events anterior to the murder, there remains only one unplaced. By the doctorâs evidence, the tramp, when found, had been dead at least forty-eight hoursâwith a possible margin of twenty-four hours more. Now, with no other facts to help me than those we have discussed, I place the death as having occurred on the morning of June 7th.â
I stared at him, stupefied.
âBut how? Why? How can you possibly know?â
âBecause only in that way can the sequence of events be logically explained. Mon ami, I have taken you step by step along the way. Do you not now see what is so glaringly plain?â
âMy dear Poirot, I canât see anything glaring about it. I did think I was beginning to see my way before, but Iâm now hopelessly fogged.â
Poirot looked at me sadly, and shook his head. âMon Dieu! But it is triste! A good intelligenceâand so deplorably lacking in method. There is an exercise most excellent for the development of the little grey cells. I will impart it to youââ
âFor Heavenâs sake, not now! You really are the most irritating of fellows, Poirot. For goodnessâ sake, get on and tell me who killed M. Renauld.â
âThat is just what I am not sure of as yet.â
âBut you said it was glaringly clear?â
âWe talk at cross-purposes, my friend. Remember, it is two crimes we are investigatingâfor which, as I pointed out to you, we have the necessary two bodies. There, there, ne vous impatientez pas! I explain all. To begin with, we apply our psychology. We find three points at which M. Renauld displays a distinct change of view and actionâthree psychological points therefore. The occurs immediately after arriving in Merlinville, the second after quarrelling with his son on a certain subject, the third on the morning of June 7th. Now for the three causes. We can attribute No. 1 to meeting Madame Daubreuil. No. 2 is indirectly connected with her since it concerns a marriage between M. Renauldâs son and her daughter. But the cause of No. 3 is hidden from us. We have to deduce it. Now, mon ami, let me ask you a question; who do we believe to have planned this crime?â
âGeorges Conneau,â I said doubtfully, eyeing Poirot warily.
âExactly. Now Giraud laid it down as an axiom that a woman lies to save herself, the man she loves, and her child. Since we are satisfied that was Georges Conneau who dictated the lie to her, and as Georges Conneau is not Jack Renauld, follows that the third case is put out of court. And, still attributing the crime to Georges Conneau, the first is equally so. So we are forced to the secondâthat Madame Renauld lied for the sake of the man she lovedâor in other words, for the sake of Georges Conneau. You agree to that.â
âYes,â I admitted. âIt seems logical enough.â
âBien! Madame Renauld loves Georges Conneau. Who, then, is Georges Conneau?â
âThe tramp.â
âHave we any evidence to show that Madame Renauld loved the tramp?â
âNo, butââ
âVery well then. Do not cling to theories where facts no longer support them. Ask yourself instead who Madame Renauld did love.â
I shook my head perplexed.
âMais, oui, you know perfectly. Who did Madame Renauld love so dearly that when she saw his dead body, she fell down in a swoon?â
I stared dumbfounded.
âHer husband?â I gasped.
Poirot nodded.
âHer husbandâor Georges Conneau, whichever you like to call him.â
I rallied myself.
âBut itâs impossible.â
âHow âimpossible?â Did we not agree just now that Madame Daubreuil was in a position to blackmail Georges Conneau?â
âYes, butââ
âAnd did she not very effectively blackmail M. Renauld?â
âThat may be true enough, butââ
âAnd is it not a fact that we know nothing of M. Renauldâs youth and upbringing? That he springs suddenly into existence as a French Canadian exactly twenty-two years ago?â
âAll that is so,â I said more firmly, âbut you seem to me to be overlooking one salient point.â
âWhat is it, my friend?â
âWhy, we have admitted Georges Conneau planned the crime. That brings us to the ridiculous statement that he planned his own murder!â
âEh bien, mon ami,â said Poirot placidly, âthat is just what he did do!â
In a measured voice, Poirot began his exposition.
âIt seems strange to you, mon ami, that a man should plan his own death? So strange, that you prefer to reject the truth as fantastic, and to revert to a story that is in reality ten times more impossible. Yes, M. Renauld planned his own death, but there is one detail that perhaps escapes youâhe did not intend to die.â
I shook my head, bewildered.
âBut no, it is all most simple really,â said Poirot kindly. âFor the crime that M. Renauld proposed a murderer was not necessary, as I told you, but a body was. Let us reconstruct, seeing events this time from a different angle.
âGeorges Conneau flies from justiceâto Canada. There, under an assumed name he marries, and finally acquires a vast fortune in South America. But there is a nostalgia upon him for his own country. Twenty years have elapsed, he is considerably changed in appearance, besides being a man of such eminence that no one is likely to connect him with a fugitive from justice many years ago. He deems it quite safe to return. He takes up his headquarters in England, but intends to spend the summers in France. And ill fortune, that obscure justice which shapes menâs ends, and will not allow them to evade the consequences of their acts, takes him to Merlinville. There, in the whole of France, is the one person who is capable of recognizing him. It is, of course, a gold mine to Madame Daubreuil, and a gold mine of which she is not slow to take advantage. He is helpless, absolutely in her power. And she bleeds him heavily.
âAnd then the inevitable happens. Jack Renauld falls in love with the beautiful girl he sees almost daily, and wishes to marry her. That rouses his father. At all costs, he will prevent his son marrying the daughter of this evil woman. Jack Renauld knows nothing of his fatherâs past, but Madame Renauld knows everything. She is a woman of great force of character, and passionately devoted to her husband. They take counsel together. Renauld sees only one way of escapeâdeath. He must appear to die, in reality escaping to another country where he will start again under an assumed name, and where Madame Renauld, having played the widowâs part for a while, can join him. It is essential that she should have control of the money, so he alters his will. How they meant to manage the body business originally, I do not knowâpossibly an art studentâs skeletonâand a fire or something of the kind, but long before their plans have matured an event occurs which plays into their hands. A rough tramp, violent and abusive, finds his way into the garden. There is a struggle, M. Renauld seeks to eject him, and suddenly the tramp, an epileptic, falls down in a fit. He is dead. M. Renauld calls his wife. Together they drag him into the shedâas we know, the event had occurred just outsideâand they realize the marvellous opportunity that has been vouchsafed them. The man bears no resemblance to M. Renauld, but he is middle-aged, of a usual French type. That is sufficient.
âI rather fancy that they sat on the bench up there, out of earshot from the house, discussing matters. Their plan was quickly made. The identification must rest solely on Madame Renauldâs evidence. Jack Renauld and the chauffeur (who had been with his master two years) must be got out of the way. It was unlikely that the French women servants would go near the body, and in any case Renauld intended to take measures to deceive any one not likely to appreciate details. Masters was sent off, a telegram despatched to Jack, Buenos Ayres being selected to give credence to the story that Renauld had decided upon. Having heard of me, as a rather obscure elderly detective, he wrote his appeal for help knowing that, when I arrived, the production of the letter would have a profound effect upon the examining magistrateâwhich, of course, it did.
âThey dressed the body of the tramp in a suit of M. Renauldâs and left his ragged coat and trousers by the door of the shed, not daring to take them into the house. And then, to give credence to the tale Madame Renauld was to tell, they drove the aeroplane dagger through his heart. That night, M. Renauld will first bind and gag his wife, and then, taking a spade, will dig a grave in that particular spot of ground where he knows aâhow do you call it? bunkair?âis to be made. It is essential that the body should be foundâMadame Daubreuil must have no suspicions. On the other hand, if a little time elapses, any dangers as to identity will be
Comments (0)