An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith (ebook reader with highlighter txt) 📖
- Author: Adam Smith
- Performer: 0226763749
Book online «An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith (ebook reader with highlighter txt) 📖». Author Adam Smith
parliament which followed the 25th March 1781.
The third bounty of this kind was that granted (much about the
time that we were beginning sometimes to court, and sometimes to
quarrel with our American colonies), by the 4th. Geo. III. chap.
26, upon the importation of hemp, or undressed flax, from the
British plantations. This bounty was granted for twenty-one
years, from the 24th June 1764 to the 24th June 1785. For the
first seven years, it was to be at the rate of �8 the ton; for
the second at �6; and for the third at �4. It was not extended to
Scotland, of which the climate (although hemp is sometimes raised
there in small quantities, and of an inferior quality) is not
very fit for that produce. Such a bounty upon the importation of
Scotch flax in England would have been too great a discouragement
to the native produce of the southern part of the united kingdom.
The fourth bounty of this kind was that granted by the 5th Geo.
III. chap. 45, upon the importation of wood from America. It was
granted for nine years from the 1st January 1766 to the 1st
January 1775. During the first three years, it was to be for
every hundred-and-twenty good deals, at the rate of �1, and for
every load containing fifty cubic feet of other square timber, at
the rate of 12s. For the second three years, it was for deals, to
be at the rate of 15s., and for other squared timber at the rate
of 8s.; and for the third three years, it was for deals, to be at
the rate of 10s.; and for every other squared timber at the rate
of 5s.
The fifth bounty of this kind was that granted by the 9th Geo.
III. chap. 38, upon the importation of raw silk from the British
plantations. It was granted for twenty-one years, from the 1st
January 1770, to the 1st January 1791. For the first seven years,
it was to be at the rate of �25 for every hundred pounds value ;
for the second, at �20; and for the third, at �15. The management
of the silk-worm, and the preparation of silk, requires so much
hand-labour, and labour is so very dear in America, that even
this great bounty, I have been informed, was not likely to
produce any considerable effect.
The sixth Bounty of this kind was that granted by 11th Geo. III.
chap. 50, for the importation of pipe, hogshead, and barrelstaves
and leading from the British plantations. It was granted for nine
years, from 1st January 1772 to the 1st January 1781. For the
first three years, it was, for a certain quantity of each, to be
at the rate of �6; for the second three years at �4; and for the
third three years at �2.
The seventh and last bounty of this kind was that granted by the
19th Geo. III chap. 37, upon the importation of hemp from
Ireland. It was granted in the same manner as that for the
importation of hemp and undressed flax from America, for
twenty-one years, from the 24th June 1779 to the 24th June 1800.
The term is divided likewise into three periods, of seven years
each; and in each of those periods, the rate of the Irish bounty
is the same with that of the American. It does not, however, like
the American bounty, extend to the importation of undressed flax.
It would have been too great a discouragement to the cultivation
of that plant in Great Britain. When this last bounty was
granted, the British and Irish legislatures were not in much
better humour with one another, than the British and American had
been before. But this boon to Ireland, it is to be hoped, has
been granted under more fortunate auspices than all those to
America. The same commodities, upon which we thus gave bounties,
when imported from America, were subjected to considerable duties
when imported from any other country. The interest of our
American colonies was regarded as the same with that of the
mother country. Their wealth was considered as our wealth.
Whatever money was sent out to them, it was said, came all back
to us by the balance of trade, and we could never become a
farthing the poorer by any expense which we could lay out upon
them. They were our own in every respect, and it was an expense
laid out upon the improvement of our own property, and for the
profitable employment of our own people. It is unnecessary, I
apprehend, at present to say anything further, in order to expose
the folly of a system which fatal experience has now sufficiently
exposed. Had our American colonies really been a part of Great
Britain, those bounties might have been considered as bounties
upon production, and would still have been liable to all the
objections to which such bounties are liable, but to no other.
The exportation of the materials of manufacture is sometimes
discouraged by absolute prohibitions, and sometimes by high
duties.
Our woollen manufacturers have been more successful than any
other class of workmen, in persuading the legislature that the
prosperity of the nation depended upon the success and extension
of their particular business. They have not only obtained a
monopoly against the consumers, by an absolute prohibition of
importing woollen cloths from any foreign country; but they have
likewise obtained another monopoly against the sheep farmers and
growers of wool, by a similar prohibition of the exportation of
live sheep and wool. The severity of many of the laws which have
been enacted for the security of the revenue is very justly
complained of, as imposing heavy penalties upon actions which,
antecedent to the statutes that declared them to be crimes, had
always been understood to be innocent. But the cruellest of our
revenue laws, I will venture to affirm, are mild and gentle, in
comparison to some of those which the clamour of our merchants
and manufacturers has extorted from the legisiature, for the
support of their own absurd and oppressive monopolies. Like the
laws of Draco, these laws may be said to be all written in blood.
By the 8th of Elizabeth, chap. 3, the exporter of sheep, lambs,
or rams, was for the first offence, to forfeit all his goods for
ever, to suffer a year’s imprisonment, and then to have his left
hand cut off in a market town, upon a market day, to be there
nailed up; and for the second offence, to be adjudged a felon,
and to suffer death accordingly. To prevent the breed of our
sheep from being propagated in foreign countries, seems to have
been the object of this law. By the 13th and 14th of Charles II.
chap. 18, the exportation of wool was made felony, and the
exporter subjected to the same penalties and forfeitures as a
felon.
For the honour of the national humanity, it is to be hoped that
neither of these statutes was ever executed. The first of them,
however, so far as I know, has never been directly repealed, and
serjeant Hawkins seems to consider it as still in force. It may,
however, perhaps be considered as virtually repealed by the 12th
of Charles II. chap. 32, sect. 3, which, without expressly taking
away the penalties imposed by former statutes, imposes a new
penalty, viz. that of 20s. for every sheep exported, or attempted
to be exported, together with the forfeiture of the sheep, and of
the owner’s share of the sheep. The second of them was expressly
repealed by the 7th and 8th of William III. chap. 28, sect. 4, by
which it is declared that ” Whereas the statute of the 13th and
14th of king Charles II. made against the exportation of wool,
among other things in the said act mentioned, doth enact the same
to be deemed felony, by the severity of which penalty the
prosecution of offenders hath not been so effectually put in
execution ; be it therefore enacted, by the authority aforesaid,
that so much of the said act, which relates to the making the
said offence felony, be repealed and made void.”
The penalties, however, which are either imposed by this milder
statute, or which, though imposed by former statutes, are not
repealed by this one, are still sufficiently severe. Besides the
forfeiture of the goods, the exporter incurs the penalty of 3s.
for every pound weight of wool, either exported or attempted to
be exported, that is, about four or five times the value. Any
merchant, or other person convicted of this offence, is disabled
from requiring any debt or account belonging to him from any
factor or other person. Let his fortune be what it will,
whether he is or is not able to pay those heavy penalties, the
law means to ruin him completely. But, as the morals of the great
body of the people are not yet so corrupt as those of the
contrivers of this statute, I have not heard that any advantage
has ever been taken of this clause. If the person convicted of
this offence is not able to pay the penalties within three months
after judgment, he is to be transported for seven years; and if
he returns before the expiration of that term, he is liable to
the pains of felony, without benefit of clergy. The owner of the
ship, knowing this offence, forfeits all his interest in the ship
and furniture. The master and mariners, knowing this offence,
forfeit all their goods and chattels, and suffer three months
imprisonment. By a subsequent statute, the master suffers six
months imprisonment.
In order to prevent exportation, the whole inland commerce of
wool is laid under very burdensome and oppressive restrictions.
It cannot be packed in any box, barrel, cask, case, chest, or any
other package, but only in packs of leather or pack-cloth, on
which must be marked on the outside the words WOOL or YARN, in
large letters, not less than three inches long, on pain of
forfeiting the same and the package, and 8s. for every pound
weight, to be paid by the owner or packer. It cannot be loaden on
any horse or cart, or carried by land within five miles of the
coast, but between sun-rising, and sun-setting, on pain of
forfeiting the same, the horses and carriages. The hundred next
adjoining to the sea coast, out of, or through which the wool is
carried or exported, forfeits �20, if the wool is under the value
of �10; and if of greater value, then treble that value, together
with treble costs, to be sued for within the year. The execution
to be against any two of the inhabitants, whom the sessions must
reimburse, by an assessment on the other inhabitants, as in the
cases of robbery. And if any person compounds with the hundred
for less than this penalty, he is to be imprisoned for five
years; and any other person may prosecute. These regulations take
place through the whole kingdom.
But in the particular counties of Kent and Sussex, the
restrictions are still more troublesome. Every owner of wool
within ten miles of the sea coast must give an account in
writing, three days after shearing, to the next officer of the
customs, of the number of his fleeces, and of the places where
they are lodged. And before he removes any part of them, he must
give the like notice of the number and weight of the fleeces, and
of the name and abode of the person to whom they are sold, and of
the place to which it is intended they should be carried. No
person within fifteen miles of the sea, in the said counties, can
buy any
Comments (0)