Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know Adam Grant (good books to read for beginners .TXT) š
- Author: Adam Grant
Book online Ā«Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know Adam Grant (good books to read for beginners .TXT) šĀ». Author Adam Grant
When you read a study that surprises you, how do you react? Many people would get defensive, searching for flaws in the studyās design or the statistical analysis. Danny did the opposite. His eyes lit up, and a huge grin appeared on his face. āThat was wonderful,ā he said. āI was wrong.ā
Later, I sat down with Danny for lunch and asked him about his reaction. It looked a lot to me like the joy of being wrongāhis eyes twinkled as if he was having fun. He said that in his eighty-five years, no one had pointed that out before, but yes, he genuinely enjoys discovering that he was wrong, because it means he is now less wrong than before.
I knew the feeling. In college, what first attracted me to social science was reading studies that clashed with my expectations; I couldnāt wait to tell my roommates about all the assumptions Iād been rethinking. In my first independent research project, I tested some predictions of my own, and more than a dozen of my hypotheses turned out to be false.* It was a major lesson in intellectual humility, but I wasnāt devastated. I felt an immediate rush of excitement. Discovering I was wrong felt joyful because it meant Iād learned something. As Danny told me, āBeing wrong is the only way I feel sure Iāve learned anything.ā
Danny isnāt interested in preaching, prosecuting, or politicking. Heās a scientist devoted to the truth. When I asked him how he stays in that mode, he said he refuses to let his beliefs become part of his identity. āI change my mind at a speed that drives my collaborators crazy,ā he explained. āMy attachment to my ideas is provisional. Thereās no unconditional love for them.ā
Attachment. Thatās what keeps us from recognizing when our opinions are off the mark and rethinking them. To unlock the joy of being wrong, we need to detach. Iāve learned that two kinds of detachment are especially useful: detaching your present from your past and detaching your opinions from your identity.
Letās start with detaching your present from your past. In psychology, one way of measuring the similarity between the person you are right now and your former self is to ask: which pair of circles best describes how you see yourself?
In the moment, separating your past self from your current self can be unsettling. Even positive changes can lead to negative emotions; evolving your identity can leave you feeling derailed and disconnected. Over time, though, rethinking who you are appears to become mentally healthyāas long as you can tell a coherent story about how you got from past to present you. In one study, when people felt detached from their past selves, they became less depressed over the course of the year. When you feel as if your life is changing direction, and youāre in the process of shifting who you are, itās easier to walk away from foolish beliefs you once held.
My past self was Mr. FactsāI was too fixated on knowing. Now Iām more interested in finding out what I donāt know. As Bridgewater founder Ray Dalio told me, āIf you donāt look back at yourself and think, āWow, how stupid I was a year ago,ā then you must not have learned much in the last year.ā
The second kind of detachment is separating your opinions from your identity. Iām guessing you wouldnāt want to see a doctor whose identity is Professional Lobotomist, send your kids to a teacher whose identity is Corporal Punisher, or live in a town where the police chiefās identity is Stop-and-Frisker. Once upon a time, all of these practices were seen as reasonable and effective.
Most of us are accustomed to defining ourselves in terms of our beliefs, ideas, and ideologies. This can become a problem when it prevents us from changing our minds as the world changes and knowledge evolves. Our opinions can become so sacred that we grow hostile to the mere thought of being wrong, and the totalitarian ego leaps in to silence counterarguments, squash contrary evidence, and close the door on learning.
Who you are should be a question of what you value, not what you believe. Values are your core principles in lifeāthey might be excellence and generosity, freedom and fairness, or security and integrity. Basing your identity on these kinds of principles enables you to remain open-minded about the best ways to advance them. You want the doctor whose identity is protecting health, the teacher whose identity is helping students learn, and the police chief whose identity is promoting safety and justice. When they define themselves by values rather than opinions, they buy themselves the flexibility to update their practices in light of new evidence.
THE YODA EFFECT: āYOU MUST UNLEARN WHAT YOU HAVE LEARNEDā
On my quest to find people who enjoy discovering they were wrong, a trusted colleague told me I had to meet Jean-Pierre Beugoms. Heās in his late forties, and heās the sort of person whoās honest to a fault; he tells the truth even if it hurts. When his son was a toddler, they were watching a space documentary together, and Jean-Pierre casually mentioned that the sun would one day turn into a red giant and engulf the Earth. His son was not amused. Between tears, he cried, āBut I love this planet!ā Jean-Pierre felt so terrible that he decided to bite his tongue instead of mentioning threats that could prevent the Earth from even lasting that long.
Back in the 1990s, Jean-Pierre had a hobby of collecting the predictions that pundits made on the news and scoring his own forecasts against them. Eventually he started competing in forecasting tournamentsāinternational contests hosted by Good Judgment, where people try to predict the future. Itās a daunting task; thereās an old saying that historians canāt even predict the past. A typical tournament draws thousands of entrants from around the world to anticipate big political, economic, and technological events. The questions are
Comments (0)