Short Fiction Edgar Allan Poe (books for men to read .txt) đ
- Author: Edgar Allan Poe
Book online «Short Fiction Edgar Allan Poe (books for men to read .txt) đ». Author Edgar Allan Poe
âCannot say that Iâ ââ
âIndeed!â âwhy it was I who told Aristotle that by sneezing, men expelled superfluous ideas through the proboscis.â
âWhich isâ âhiccup!â âundoubtedly the case,â said the metaphysician, while he poured out for himself another bumper of Mousseux, and offered his snuffbox to the fingers of his visitor.
âThere was Plato, too,â continued his Majesty, modestly declining the snuffbox and the compliment it impliedâ ââthere was Plato, too, for whom I, at one time, felt all the affection of a friend. You knew Plato, Bon-Bon?â âah, no, I beg a thousand pardons. He met me at Athens, one day, in the Parthenon, and told me he was distressed for an idea. I bade him write down that Ï ÎœÎżáżŠÏ Î”ÏÏÎčÎœ Î±Ï Î»ÎżÏ. He said that he would do so, and went home, while I stepped over to the pyramids. But my conscience smote me for having uttered a truth, even to aid a friend, and hastening back to Athens, I arrived behind the philosopherâs chair as he was inditing the âÎ±Ï Î»ÎżÏ.â
âGiving the lamma a fillip with my finger, I turned it upside down. So the sentence now read âÏ ÎœÎżáżŠÏ Î”ÏÏÎčÎœ Î±Ï ÎłÎżÏâ, and is, you perceive, the fundamental doctrines in his metaphysics.â
âWere you ever at Rome?â asked the restaurateur, as he finished his second bottle of Mousseux, and drew from the closet a larger supply of Chambertin.
âBut once, Monsieur Bon-Bon, but once. There was a time,â said the devil, as if reciting some passage from a bookâ ââthere was a time when occurred an anarchy of five years, during which the republic, bereft of all its officers, had no magistracy besides the tribunes of the people, and these were not legally vested with any degree of executive powerâ âat that time, Monsieur Bon-Bonâ âat that time only I was in Rome, and I have no earthly acquaintance, consequently, with any of its philosophy.â6
âWhat do you think ofâ âwhat do you think ofâ âhiccup!â âEpicurus?â
âWhat do I think of whom?â said the devil, in astonishment, âyou cannot surely mean to find any fault with Epicurus! What do I think of Epicurus! Do you mean me, sir?â âI am Epicurus! I am the same philosopher who wrote each of the three hundred treatises commemorated by Diogenes Laertes.â
âThatâs a lie!â said the metaphysician, for the wine had gotten a little into his head.
âVery well!â âvery well, sir!â âvery well, indeed, sir!â said his Majesty, apparently much flattered.
âThatâs a lie!â repeated the restaurateur, dogmatically; âthatâs aâ âhiccup!â âa lie!â
âWell, well, have it your own way!â said the devil, pacifically, and Bon-Bon, having beaten his Majesty at argument, thought it his duty to conclude a second bottle of Chambertin.
âAs I was saying,â resumed the visitorâ ââas I was observing a little while ago, there are some very outrĂ© notions in that book of yours Monsieur Bon-Bon. What, for instance, do you mean by all that humbug about the soul? Pray, sir, what is the soul?â
âTheâ âhiccup!â âsoul,â replied the metaphysician, referring to his MS., âis undoubtedlyâ ââ
âNo, sir!â
âIndubitablyâ ââ
âNo, sir!â
âIndisputablyâ ââ
âNo, sir!â
âEvidentlyâ ââ
âNo, sir!â
âIncontrovertiblyâ ââ
âNo, sir!â
âHiccup!â ââ
âNo, sir!â
âAnd beyond all question, aâ ââ
âNo sir, the soul is no such thing!â (Here the philosopher, looking daggers, took occasion to make an end, upon the spot, of his third bottle of Chambertin.)
âThenâ âhiccup!â âpray, sirâ âwhatâ âwhat is it?â
âThat is neither here nor there, Monsieur Bon-Bon,â replied his Majesty, musingly. âI have tastedâ âthat is to say, I have known some very bad souls, and some tooâ âpretty good ones.â Here he smacked his lips, and, having unconsciously let fall his hand upon the volume in his pocket, was seized with a violent fit of sneezing.
He continued.
âThere was the soul of Cratinusâ âpassable: Aristophanesâ âracy: Platoâ âexquisiteâ ânot your Plato, but Plato the comic poet; your Plato would have turned the stomach of Cerberusâ âfaugh! Then let me see! there were Naevius, and Andronicus, and Plautus, and Terentius. Then there were Lucilius, and Catullus, and Naso, and Quintus Flaccusâ âdear Quinty! as I called him when he sung a seculare for my amusement, while I toasted him, in pure good humor, on a fork. But they want flavor, these Romans. One fat Greek is worth a dozen of them, and besides will keep, which cannot be said of a Quirite. Let us taste your Sauterne.â
Bon-Bon had by this time made up his mind to the nil admirari and endeavored to hand down the bottles in question. He was, however, conscious of a strange sound in the room like the wagging of a tail. Of this, although extremely indecent in his Majesty, the philosopher took no notice:â âsimply kicking the dog, and requesting him to be quiet. The visitor continued:
âI found that Horace tasted very much like Aristotle;â âyou know I am fond of variety. Terentius I could not have told from Menander. Naso, to my astonishment, was Nicander in disguise. Virgilius had a strong twang of Theocritus. Martial put me much in mind of Archilochusâ âand Titus Livius was positively Polybius and none other.â
âHic-cup!â here replied Bon-Bon, and his majesty proceeded:
âBut if I have a penchant, Monsieur Bon-Bonâ âif I have a penchant, it is for a philosopher. Yet, let me tell you, sir, it is not every devâ âI mean it is not every gentleman who knows how to choose a philosopher. Long ones are not good; and the best, if not carefully shelled, are apt to be
Comments (0)