Middlemarch George Eliot (essential reading txt) đ
- Author: George Eliot
Book online «Middlemarch George Eliot (essential reading txt) đ». Author George Eliot
âWhat line shall you take, then?â said Mr. Chichely, the coroner, a great coursing comrade of Mr. Vincyâs.
âOh, Iâm precious glad Iâm not one of the Directors now. I shall vote for referring the matter to the Directors and the Medical Board together. I shall roll some of my responsibility on your shoulders, Doctor,â said Mr. Vincy, glancing first at Dr. Sprague, the senior physician of the town, and then at Lydgate who sat opposite. âYou medical gentlemen must consult which sort of black draught you will prescribe, eh, Mr. Lydgate?â
âI know little of either,â said Lydgate; âbut in general, appointments are apt to be made too much a question of personal liking. The fittest man for a particular post is not always the best fellow or the most agreeable. Sometimes, if you wanted to get a reform, your only way would be to pension off the good fellows whom everybody is fond of, and put them out of the question.â
Dr. Sprague, who was considered the physician of most âweight,â though Dr. Minchin was usually said to have more âpenetration,â divested his large heavy face of all expression, and looked at his wineglass while Lydgate was speaking. Whatever was not problematical and suspected about this young manâ âfor example, a certain showiness as to foreign ideas, and a disposition to unsettle what had been settled and forgotten by his eldersâ âwas positively unwelcome to a physician whose standing had been fixed thirty years before by a treatise on Meningitis, of which at least one copy marked âownâ was bound in calf. For my part I have some fellow-feeling with Dr. Sprague: oneâs self-satisfaction is an untaxed kind of property which it is very unpleasant to find deprecated.
Lydgateâs remark, however, did not meet the sense of the company. Mr. Vincy said, that if he could have his way, he would not put disagreeable fellows anywhere.
âHang your reforms!â said Mr. Chichely. âThereâs no greater humbug in the world. You never hear of a reform, but it means some trick to put in new men. I hope you are not one of the Lancetâs men, Mr. Lydgateâ âwanting to take the coronership out of the hands of the legal profession: your words appear to point that way.â
âI disapprove of Wakley,â interposed Dr. Sprague, âno man more: he is an ill-intentioned fellow, who would sacrifice the respectability of the profession, which everybody knows depends on the London Colleges, for the sake of getting some notoriety for himself. There are men who donât mind about being kicked blue if they can only get talked about. But Wakley is right sometimes,â the Doctor added, judicially. âI could mention one or two points in which Wakley is in the right.â
âOh, well,â said Mr. Chichely, âI blame no man for standing up in favor of his own cloth; but, coming to argument, I should like to know how a coroner is to judge of evidence if he has not had a legal training?â
âIn my opinion,â said Lydgate, âlegal training only makes a man more incompetent in questions that require knowledge of another kind. People talk about evidence as if it could really be weighed in scales by a blind Justice. No man can judge what is good evidence on any particular subject, unless he knows that subject well. A lawyer is no better than an old woman at a postmortem examination. How is he to know the action of a poison? You might as well say that scanning verse will teach you to scan the potato crops.â
âYou are aware, I suppose, that it is not the coronerâs business to conduct the postmortem, but only to take the evidence of the medical witness?â said Mr. Chichely, with some scorn.
âWho is often almost as ignorant as the coroner himself,â said Lydgate. âQuestions of medical jurisprudence ought not to be left to the chance of decent knowledge in a medical witness, and the coroner ought not to be a man who will believe that strychnine will destroy the coats of the stomach if an ignorant practitioner happens to tell him so.â
Lydgate had really lost sight of the fact that Mr. Chichely was his Majestyâs coroner, and ended innocently with the question, âDonât you agree with me, Dr. Sprague?â
âTo a certain extentâ âwith regard to populous districts, and in the metropolis,â said the Doctor. âBut I hope it will be long before this part of the country loses the services of my friend Chichely, even though it might get the best man in our profession to succeed him. I am sure Vincy will agree with me.â
âYes, yes, give me a coroner who is a good coursing man,â said Mr. Vincy, jovially. âAnd in my opinion, youâre safest with a lawyer. Nobody can know everything. Most things are âvisitation of God.â And as to poisoning, why, what you want to know is the law. Come, shall we join the ladies?â
Lydgateâs private opinion was that Mr. Chichely might be the very coroner without bias as to the coats of the stomach, but he had not meant to be personal. This was one of the difficulties of moving in good Middlemarch society: it was dangerous to insist on knowledge as a qualification for any salaried office. Fred Vincy had called Lydgate a prig, and now Mr. Chichely was inclined to call him prick-eared; especially when, in the drawing-room, he seemed to be making himself eminently agreeable to Rosamond, whom he had easily monopolized in a tĂȘte-Ă -tĂȘte, since Mrs. Vincy herself sat at the tea-table. She resigned no domestic function to her daughter; and the matronâs blooming good-natured face, with the two volatile pink strings floating from her fine throat, and her cheery manners to husband and children, was certainly among the great attractions of the Vincy houseâ âattractions which made it all the easier to fall in love with the daughter. The tinge of unpretentious, inoffensive vulgarity in Mrs. Vincy
Comments (0)