Death of the Ayn Rand Scholar Gray Cavender (motivational novels for students .TXT) š
- Author: Gray Cavender
Book online Ā«Death of the Ayn Rand Scholar Gray Cavender (motivational novels for students .TXT) šĀ». Author Gray Cavender
āSo, what made her the best candidate, Professor Gilroy?ā
āWell, she has a good educational pedigree, and she was at Mount Holyoke and all that.ā He said this in a way that made it sound somehow only minimally acceptable. āAnd, she is a Rand scholar. Sheās written a book on Randās novels. Actually, two books, I think. As well as several articles on Rand. All wereā¦well received.ā He said this in a dismissive way.
āAnd what did it mean to have such a Center?ā
āMost obviously, courses were added to the curriculum, both undergrad and grad, here and in Business; Nelda teaches the English courses. I take it that a part of her duties was to proselytize. Sheās supposed to be generating student interest in Randā¦honors theses, dissertationsā¦I think the courses that she added to the curriculum were somehow tied to that. I know that sheās in the process of planning a symposiumāfor spring semester, I thinkāthat would bring in other scholars and create a buzz.ā
Gilroy said ābuzzā as if this was somehow distasteful. āSomeone said that there might be either an edited volume or maybe a special issue of a journal comprised of the conference papersā¦but of course thatās just table talk.ā He seemed on to be on the verge of another comment, but grew quiet, then added, āNow, of courseā¦ā He seemed to Jillian to be genuinely reflective. āDetective, do you think that Nelda was murdered?ā
āItās too early to know. Thatās the sort of thing that the Forensics people are looking at. Professor, from what you were saying in the corridor earlier, there was some anger about her hiring. Is that correct?ā
āYes, people were far more upset about this than what Jonathan intimated. Some were angry about a donor literally having the power, the monetary where with-all, to create a position. You have to understand, because universities are so desperate for funding, itās difficult to get new positions, especially in the Humanities. The English Department teaches the entire entry freshman class every yearāthatās over eleven thousand studentsābut new positions are almost nonexistent. We arenāt even guaranteed replacement positions if someone retires or takes a job at another university. So, thereās that. And then, other people just donāt like it that outside organizations with obvious political agendas can affect university hiring. Whether itās the Rand organization or the Koch Brothersāby the way, theyāre here tooālots of faculty just donāt like it. I donāt like it. I donāt have a political bone in my body, but it troubles me.ā
āSo, this anger against the award, was it directed against her personally? I donāt necessarily mean from you, but what about others?ā
āWell, yes, I was against having anything to do with locating the Center in the English Department, and of course that included hiring her as well. Rand may have been a successful novelist, in terms of book sales, but that was a long time ago. Sheās not considered to be such an important writer these days. In other words, she hasnāt stood the test of time. However, once Nelda was here, Iāve tried to be civilāsheās a colleague after all, and this is a university. Although I have to say that with Nelda, thatās not always easy. Sheās not all that civil herself. Sheās quite arrogant.ā
āIs this a widely held view of her?ā
āIt depends. Some people smell a possible career connection and suck-up to her.ā He said the words āsome peopleā in a way that made it clear that he had specific people in mind. āOthers are more ālive and let live,ā he said, and made air quotes. āBut some, also here in English and in other departments, have been even more vocal, moreā¦I guess youād say agitated. Some of this was discussed in the Faculty Senate, although that went nowhere. And, I understand that there was an article submitted to The Chronicle, thatās The Chronicle of Higher Education which is THE outlet for any discussion of universities. My understanding is that the article addressed the specific situation here at ASU, but was about the more general situation in universities, as well.ā
āWho wrote the article?ā
āAhā¦Iāmā¦I havenāt actually seen such an article so maybe I shouldnāt comment further on that. I do know that it has not yet been published. You have to understand, Detective, feelings run high on these matters.ā
āI completely understand. Iāll of course interview Ms. Wilson and Professor Keefer, but would you suggest that we chat with others, either your colleagues or professors in other departments?ā
āWellā¦I hate to name namesā¦ā
āProfessor Gilroy, this isnāt about being a tattle-tale on the playground,ā she said, changing her tack. āThis may turn out to be a murder investigation. The more accurate our picture is, the better our investigation can proceed.ā Then, she changed tack again. āPlease, we need your help. After all, you were enough of a stand-up person that you called us to report her death.ā
Maybe the compliment appealed to Gilroyās vanity or maybe it made him see reasonā¦in any case, he said, āYouāre right, of course. So, the person in the Faculty Senate who was far and away the most resolute in his opposition to the Rand award, and especially to the Koch Brothers, was Ian Naremore.ā
āIan Naremoreā¦OK.ā
āRight, right, you may know him. Heās a Justice Studies professor.ā
āYes, I had classes with him.ā
āWell, it is a small world after all. By the way, and I apologize for not rememberingāsome of my classes are quite largeābut Detective Warne, did you ever have
Comments (0)