Loverly:The Life and Times of My Fair Lady (Broadway Legacies) McHugh, Dominic (snow like ashes series txt) đ
Book online «Loverly:The Life and Times of My Fair Lady (Broadway Legacies) McHugh, Dominic (snow like ashes series txt) đ». Author McHugh, Dominic
Pickering
I said to him, âYou did it!
You did it! You did it!
I didnât think it possible
But there she is!
I told you to forget it;
I warned youâd regret it.
And now a prince is telling her
How fair she is.
I was as excited
And agog as I could be.
Higgins
It was nonsense. Silly nonsense.47
Pickering
I was more uneasy,
More afraid than even she.
Higgins
Of course. Of course.
Dear chap, of course you were.
It didnât mean half as much to her.
Pickering
You absolutely did it!
You did it! You did it!
They thought she was ecstatic
And so damned aristocratic,
And they never knew that
You did it!
Eventually, the first two lines of Pickeringâs first stanza and the last four of his final stanza were welded together and the rest discarded. The change shortened the number and thereby increased its musical pressure, and also removed the comments made by Higgins and Pickering that vigorously insult Eliza. Pickering asserts that he was more afraid about the ball than Eliza was, while Higgins agrees that the episode did not mean âhalf as much to herâ as it did to the Colonel. This represents something of a turn of character for Pickering: though the entire song finds him less sympathetic than normal toward Eliza, the point is that the men ignore her after her triumph, rather than being actively insulting.48 Likewise, for Higgins to say âIt didnât mean half as much to herâ demonizes him in a way that the rest of the song does not.
The other change was probably for musical rather than dramatic considerations. Originally, the final section of the songâwhen Pickering and the servants sing a contrapuntal passage following âCongratulations, Professor Higgins!ââwas more extensive (see appendix 5). The published version contains only the first and last stanzas of this initial lyric (with a couple of minor changes), and the majority of the material at this point was cut. Interestingly, this music contains a different gesture to anything else in the show (partly quoted in ex. 6.7). Although the âCongratulations!â passage is contrapuntal even in its published form, the antiphonal effects between Pickering and the servants in the original version made the number stiffer, more like an operetta ensemble, and thereby more old-fashioned. In spite of William Zinsserâs insistence that Lerner and Loewe âwere a throwback to the earlier generic team of Gilbert and Sullivanâ and that Loeweâs music âcontinued to sound Viennese,â the composer in fact removed the passage of music that most connected the show to these styles of composition.49
Ex. 6.7. âYou Did It,â cut passage.
This cut also represents an act of compression: it drives the piece home more quickly, more smoothly, and more breathtakingly. One notable aspect of the passage was the return of a second earlier theme (âI must confess without undue conceit,â deriving from âNow wait, now wait, give credit where itâs dueâ) in addition to the âYou did it!â theme. The latter remained in the published version but only as a contrapuntal underpinning of the new âCongratulations!â theme; the barer âI must confessâ part and the antiphonal section as a whole draw attention to themselves more assertively. By removing them, Loewe gave the closing section the air and function of an operatic stretta but foreshortened it to avoid direct allusion.
Loeweâs triumph in My Fair Lady was to create a score that truly enhances the potential of Pygmalion yet without overwhelming or undermining that text with extraneous musical numbers. Surely âWhy Canât the English?â depicts Higginsâs character better than any dialogue could, while the lessons sequence is a series of musical scenes with little precedence in the musical theater repertoire. This also represents a clear enhancement of Shawâs text. Furthermore, theatrical technique is apparent throughout the score; for instance, âThe Embassy Waltzâ is a compelling use of musical diegesis, where the music is both part of the onstage action and expressive of the emotion of the scene. As for musical technique, the range of compositional approaches is brilliant, whether in the use of dance forms in the creation of songs like âShow Meâ and âJust You Waitâ or large-scale forms as in âYou Did It,â as is the no less impressive way in which Loewe binds it all together. In this, he shares the credit with his colleagues: Rittmannâs arrangements and the orchestrations of Bennett, Lang, and Mason helped make the score contrapuntally taut and gave it its magical palette of sonorities.
But in the end, Lerner and Loeweâs most impressive achievement was the way in which they eventually balanced the Higgins-Eliza relationship in their songs. We have seen numerous examples of songs discarded as inappropriate (âThereâs a Thing Called Loveâ), replaced by better numbers (âPlease Donât Marry Meâ into âAn Ordinary Manâ), replaced by songs with a completely different subtext (âShyâ into âI Could Have Danced All Nightâ), or refined to remove gestures of conventional romance (âYou Did Itâ). Although it is relatively commonplace for large numbers of songs from Broadway shows to be discarded before completion or cut before opening night, it is rare to find quite such a clear motivation for their removal as in My Fair Lady.
7
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
MY FAIR LADY ON STAGE
The performance history of My Fair Lady has been characterized by long runs and critical success. The original Broadway production ran for more than six years and 2,717 performances, and in so doing overtook Rodgers and Hammersteinâs Oklahoma!
Comments (0)