Whose Body? Dorothy L. Sayers (english books to improve english txt) đ
- Author: Dorothy L. Sayers
Book online «Whose Body? Dorothy L. Sayers (english books to improve english txt) đ». Author Dorothy L. Sayers
âSo youâd thinkâ âor the suicide would have happened the first time he started to cross the road. However, I didnât overlook the possibility. Iâve got particulars of all todayâs street accidents, and I can lay my hand on my heart and say that none of them is Sir Reuben. Besides, he took his latchkey with him, which looks as though heâd meant to come back.â
âHave you seen the men he dined with?â
âI found two of them at the club. They said that he seemed in the best of health and spirits, spoke of looking forward to joining Lady Levy later onâ âperhaps at Christmasâ âand referred with great satisfaction to this morningâs business transaction, in which one of themâ âa man called Anderson of Wyndhamâsâ âwas himself concerned.â
âThen up till about nine oâclock, anyhow, he had no apparent intention or expectation of disappearing.â
âNoneâ âunless he was a most consummate actor. Whatever happened to change his mind must have happened either at the mysterious appointment which he kept after dinner, or while he was in bed between midnight and 5:30 a.m.â
âWell, Bunter,â said Lord Peter, âwhat do you make of it?â
âNot in my department, my lord. Except that it is odd that a gentleman who was too flurried or unwell to fold his clothes as usual should remember to clean his teeth and put his boots out. Those are two things that quite frequently get overlooked, my lord.â
âIf you mean anything personal, Bunter,â said Lord Peter, âI can only say that I think the speech an unworthy one. Itâs a sweet little problem, Parker mine. Look here, I donât want to butt in, but I should dearly love to see that bedroom tomorrow. âTis not that I mistrust thee, dear, but I should uncommonly like to see it. Say me not nayâ âtake another drop of brandy and a Villar Villar, but say not, say not nay!â
âOf course you can come and see itâ âyouâll probably find lots of things Iâve overlooked,â said the other, equably, accepting the proffered hospitality.
âParker, acushla, youâre an honour to Scotland Yard. I look at you, and Sugg appears a myth, a fable, an idiot-boy, spawned in a moonlight hour by some fantastic poetâs brain. Sugg is too perfect to be possible. What does he make of the body, by the way?â
âSugg says,â replied Parker, with precision, âthat the body died from a blow on the back of the neck. The doctor told him that. He says itâs been dead a day or two. The doctor told him that, too. He says itâs the body of a well-to-do Hebrew of about fifty. Anybody could have told him that. He says itâs ridiculous to suppose it came in through the window without anybody knowing anything about it. He says it probably walked in through the front door and was murdered by the household. Heâs arrested the girl because sheâs short and frail-looking and quite unequal to downing a tall and sturdy Semite with a poker. Heâd arrest Thipps, only Thipps was away in Manchester all yesterday and the day before and didnât come back till late last nightâ âin fact, he wanted to arrest him till I reminded him that if the body had been a day or two dead, little Thipps couldnât have done him in at 10:30 last night. But heâll arrest him tomorrow as an accessoryâ âand the old lady with the knitting, too, I shouldnât wonder.â
âWell, Iâm glad the little man has so much of an alibi,â said Lord Peter, âthough if youâre only glueing your faith to cadaveric lividity, rigidity, and all the other quiddities, you must be prepared to have some sceptical beast of a prosecuting counsel walk slap-bang through the medical evidence. Remember Impey Biggs defending in that Chelsea teashop affair? Six bloominâ medicos contradictinâ each other in the box, anâ old Impey elocutinâ abnormal cases from Glaister and Dixon Mann till the eyes of the jury reeled in their heads! âAre you prepared to swear, Dr. Thingumtight, that the onset of rigor mortis indicates the hour of death without the possibility of error?â âSo far as my experience goes, in the majority of cases,â says the doctor, all stiff. âAh!â says Biggs, âbut this is a Court of Justice, Doctor, not a Parliamentary election. We canât get on without a minority report. The law, Dr. Thingumtight, respects the rights of the minority, alive or dead.â Some ass laughs, and old Biggs sticks his chest out and gets impressive. âGentlemen, this is no laughing matter. My clientâ âan upright and honourable gentlemanâ âis being tried for his lifeâ âfor his life, gentlemenâ âand it is the business of the prosecution to show his guiltâ âif they canâ âwithout a shadow of doubt. Now, Dr. Thingumtight, I ask you again, can you solemnly swear, without the least shadow of doubtâ âprobable, possible shadow of doubtâ âthat this unhappy woman met her death neither sooner nor later than Thursday evening? A probable opinion? Gentlemen, we are not Jesuits, we are straightforward Englishmen. You cannot ask a British-born jury to convict any man on the authority of a probable opinion.â Hum of applause.â
âBiggsâs man was guilty all the same,â said Parker.
âOf course he was. But he was acquitted all the same, anâ what youâve just said is libel.â Wimsey walked over to the bookshelf and took down a volume of Medical Jurisprudence. âââRigor mortisâ âcan only be stated in a very general wayâ âmany factors determine the result.â Cautious brute. âOn the average, however, stiffening will have begunâ âneck and jawâ â5 to 6 hours after deathââ âmâmâ ââin all likelihood have passed off in the bulk of cases by the end of 36 hours. Under certain circumstances, however, it may appear unusually early, or be retarded unusually long!â Helpful, ainât it, Parker? âBrown-SĂ©quard statesâ ââ ⊠3Âœ minutes after death.â ââ ⊠In certain cases not until lapse of 16 hours after deathâ ââ ⊠present as long as 21 days thereafter.â Lord! âModifying factorsâ âageâ âmuscular stateâ âor febrile diseasesâ âor where temperature of environment is highââ âand so on and so onâ âany bloominâ thing. Never mind. You can run the argument for what itâs worth to Sugg. He
Comments (0)