What Is Art? Leo Tolstoy (good books to read for 12 year olds TXT) đ
- Author: Leo Tolstoy
Book online «What Is Art? Leo Tolstoy (good books to read for 12 year olds TXT) đ». Author Leo Tolstoy
The success of a very primitive novelâ âthe story of Joseph, which made its way into the sacred books of the Jews, spread from land to land and from age to age, and continues to be read today among people quite free from bibliolatryâ âshows how nearly âuniversalâ may be the appeal of this kind of art. This branch includes all harmless jokes, folk-stories, nursery rhymes, and even dolls, if only the author or designer has expressed a feeling (tenderness, pleasure, humour, or whatnot) so as to infect others.
But how are we to know what are the âbestâ feelings? What is good? and what is evil? This is decided by âreligious perception.â Some such perception exists in every human being; there is always something he approves of, and something he disapproves of. Reason and conscience are always present, active or latent, as long as man lives. Miss Flora Shaw tells that the most degraded cannibal she ever met, drew the line at eating his own motherâ ânothing would induce him to entertain the thought, his moral sense was revolted by the suggestion. In most societies the âreligious perception,â to which they have advancedâ âthe foremost stage in mankindâs long march towards perfection, which has been discernedâ âhas been clearly expressed by someone, and more or less consciously accepted as an ideal by the many. But there are transition periods in history when the worn-out formularies of a past age have ceased to satisfy men, or have become so incrusted with superstitions that their original brightness is lost. The âreligious perceptionâ that is dawning may not yet have found such expression as to be generally understood, but for all that it exists, and shows itself by compelling men to repudiate beliefs that satisfied their forefathers, the outward and visible signs of which are still endowed and dominant long after their spirit has taken refuge in temples not made with hands.
At such times it is difficult for men to understand each other, for the very words needed to express the deepest experiences of menâs consciousness mean different things to different men. So among us today, to many minds faith means credulity, and God suggests a person of the male sex, father of one only-begotten son, and creator of the universe.
This is why Tolstoyâs clear and rational âreligious perception,â expressed in the books named on a previous page, is frequently spoken of by people who have not grasped it, as âmysticism.â
The narrow materialist is shocked to find that Tolstoy will not confine himself to the âobjectiveâ view of life. Encountering in himself that âinner voiceâ which compels us all to choose between good and evil, Tolstoy refuses to be diverted from a matter which is of immediate and vital importance to him, by discussions as to the derivation of the external manifestations of conscience which biologists are able to detect in remote forms of life. The real mystic, on the other hand, shrinks from Tolstoyâs desire to try all things by the light of reason, to depend on nothing vague, and to accept nothing on authority. The man who does not trust his own reason, fears that life thus squarely faced will prove less worth having than it is when clothed in mist.
In this work, however, Tolstoy does not recapitulate at length what he has said before. He does not pause to re-explain why he condemns Patriotismâ âi.e., each manâs preference for the predominance of his own country, which leads to the murder of man by man in war; or Churches, which are sectarianâ âi.e., which striving to assert that your doxy is heterodoxy, but that our doxy is orthodoxy, make external authorities (Popes, Bibles, Councils) supreme, and cling to superstitions (their own miracles, legends, and myths), thus separating themselves from communion with the rest of mankind. Nor does he re-explain why he (like Christ) says âpitiable is your plightâ âye rich,â who live artificial lives, maintainable only by the unbrotherly use of force (police and soldiers), but blessed are ye poorâ âwho, by your way of life, are within easier reach of brotherly conditions, if you will but trust to reason and conscience, and change the direction of your hearts and of your labourâ âworking no more primarily from fear or greed, but seeking first the kingdom of righteousness, in which all good things will be added unto you. He merely summarises it all in a few sentences, defining the âreligious perceptionâ of today, which alone can decide for us âthe degree of importance both of the feelings transmitted by art and of the information transmitted by science.â
âThe religious perception of our time, in its widest and most practical application, is the consciousness that our well-being, both material and spiritual, individual and collective, temporal and eternal, lies in the growth of brotherhood among menâ âin their loving harmony with one anotherâ (see here).
And again:
âHowever differently in form people belonging to our Christian world may define the destiny of man; whether they see it in human progress in whatever sense of the words, in the union of all men in a socialistic realm, or in the establishment of a commune; whether they look forward to the union of mankind under the guidance of one universal Church, or to the federation of the worldâ âhowever various in form their definitions of the destination of human life may be, all men in our times already admit that the highest well-being attainable by men is to be reached by their union with one anotherâ (see here).
This is the foundation on which the whole work is based. It follows necessarily from this perception that we should consider as most important in science âinvestigations into the results of good and bad actions, considerations of the reasonableness or unreasonableness of human institutions and beliefs, considerations of how human life should be lived in order to obtain the greatest well-being for each; as to what one may and ought, and what one cannot and should not believe; how to subdue oneâs passions, and how to
Comments (0)