Humanistic Nursing by Loretta T. Zderad (readict TXT) 📖

to know intuitively the experience of this particular other nurse-in-her-lived-nursing-world. The consultees offered their lived-nursing-worlds each in their unique ways. Some discussed directly their pains, joys, adequacies, and inadequacies. Some discussed indirectly their panic, success, action, and immobilization. Some beyond being able to discuss their lived-worlds {107} spontaneously acted out their lived-worlds. For example, these often behaved toward me as their patients and families behaved toward them. These kinds of acted out lived-worlds I had to sense my way into to understand. When I began to wonder what it was that they wanted from consultation to take back to their lived-nursing-worlds, I would pull out of the "I-Thou" form of relating. This wonderment became my conscious clue. It was time to reflect and look at what my explorations had uncovered.

At this point transcending this "I-Thou" relation, I would look at "It." Seeing, now, what was within me, what the condition of my being was that I had intuitively taken on from the consultee, I would set it apart from myself, and see it as an empathic response. I knew that these feelings I experienced which I received existentially, globally through the compound of the consultee's words, tone inflection, volume, facial expression, posture, and positioning to me were what she experienced in her-nursing world. Verbalization of this empathized understanding fulfilled several purposes: (1) it conveyed my sympathy or joy with, and always my caring, (2) it validated that I saw it as it was for this nurse, and (3) it opened the door to our working through the possible meanings of the nurse's experience and to speculating about outcomes of alternative future nurse actions and behaviors.

Cognitively the range of these consultation discussions was broad. Some common themes were social and health histories of families, pertinent psychological growth and development factors of persons in the families of concern to the consultees, relationships between persons within the situations, resources available to the families, ways the consultees could relate with the parents and patients' families, friends, and other professionals in the situation, and the meaning of all these themes to the particular consultee.

This clinical consultation experience necessitated my being certain ways. It necessitated my being authentic with myself with regard to what responses were called forth in me in relating with a particular consultee. I viewed honesty with the consultee as a value necessary to the consultation process. In approaching the consultation I needed to be open to the consultee's angular view and predisposed toward an "I-Thou" relationship. The "I-Thou" relating necessitated subsequent scientific understanding extrapolated from it through reflection on it as "I-It." My hope in consultation was to offer both a cognitive, as well as, an ontic experience in which a mutual feeling apart from and toward the other would exist. This latter seemed most important to me. If the consultee experienced my being authentically present with her, she then would be apt to offer this type of relationship to the patients and families of concern to her.

Results of Comparison

The two clinical consultation experiences were juxtaposed, contrasted, questioned, related, and synthesized to envision their unified contribution to the construct of "clinical." The synthetic construct of "clinical" is not viewed as a mere juxtaposing, a disintegrating, or reconstructing of the contributions {108} to my knowing from either of these experiences. This comparison is viewed as a facing of the multiplicities they both present. The synthesis is an illumination of both experiences with each transfigured through their mutual presence in the "knowing place" of the comparer.[17]

In this comparison my appreciation grew of how I had uniquely implemented and conceptualized clinical consultation in my work experience. I recognized through the comparison that adequate clinical consultation demands both a passionate and dispassionate phase of "I-Thou" and "I-It" relating. Without either of these forms of consultant being-in-the-situation we degrade the term "clinical" if we employ it. Consultation lends itself naturally to a collaborative cooperative relationship. The consultant is dependent on the consultee for presentation of the specifics of particular situations. The consultee is dependent on the consultant for the tailoring of general knowledge to the consultees' particular situations. The relationship if appropriately called consultation is then of necessity interdependent. In being separate from the other while feeling with the other the consultant does not lose the ability to question. Passion undealt with or identification with the consultee inhibits the clinical purpose of the consultant and of the consultation. In identification one feels as if he were the other, rather than turning to the other and feeling with him. The degree of anxiety this provokes in the consultant can prevent looking at the consultation situation and issues in an "I-It" manner. The consultant loses the ability to question.

Through this comparison I was able to reflect on the graduate student nursing consultation experience in an "I-It" way. At this time it became a "clinical" experience for me. The lack of this reflective phase in this experience highlighted the reflective phase already existent in the working clinical consultation experience. The existence of this phase in the working clinical consultation experience highlighted its absence in the graduate student nursing consultation experience. My commonplace nursing world through this comparison became awarely meaningful and availed itself for conceptualization. A situation is not a "clinical" experience until the "would be" clinician can reflect, analyze, categorize, and synthesize it.

Clinical Is

A potentially clinical psychiatric mental health situation becomes "clinical" if the clinician relates to the helpee to awaken his unique potential or ontic wholeness, and noetically transcending this relating conceptualizes its meaning.

Clinician signifies a particular mode of being and a particular kind of cognitive knowledge. With all his human capacity the clinician relates with his clinical-world consciously and deliberately in "I-Thou," and "I-It."

Relating in "I-Thou" with the other in-his-clinical-world the clinician gives himself and receives back the other and himself in the sphere of "the between." {109} He knows the other and the more of himself in this relating. He is confirmed and confirms the other through the other's presence with him. Thus, he calls forth the other's actualizing of self through the clinical relationship. In accepting the other as he is the clinician imagines and responds to the reality of his potential for becoming, becoming according to his unique capacity for humanness.

Relating in "I-It" with his clinical world the clinician noetically transcends himself, objectifies himself, and studies his "I-Thou" knowing. He teases it apart. He classifies and studies it. He asks it questions. He compares and contrasts it to other clinical experiences. He discusses its many aspects in dialogue with his "inward," and possibly "outward" "Thous." He reorders its parts. He shapes, creates, plans from and for its clinical existence. Thus, he ever augments a world of heuristic knowing.

This "how" allows the clinical fulfillment of my nursing "why." Comfort is "why" I, as a nurse, am in the health-nursing situation. As conceptualized "comfort" is being able to freely control and plan for one's self, being fully in accord at a particular time, in a particular situation, with one's unique potential. Now, "what" is the nature of the nurse's world, the health-nursing situation?

ALL-AT-ONCE: WHAT

The term "all-at-once," arose within me as a construct that would metaphorically describe the multifarious multiplicities that exist within nursing situations. Completing my comparison of Gilbert's and Muller's written works to grasp how they viewed the nature of psychiatric mental health nursing I found myself mulling over and fussing.[18] Your question is probably, mulling and fussing over what? While I mulled over and fussed I believe I, too, was perplexed. Why was I unsatisfied?

I had compared Gilbert's and Muller's writing styles, their conceptions of man, approaches to nursing, nursing education, supervision, and consultation. Their similarities and differences were noted, and how each presented herself predominantly. Then I cited the nursing communities they sought to influence and those in which they were while writing. Through reviewing their bibliographies and biographies I indicated the sources that had influenced them.

Still I mulled over, fussed, and was perplexed. I awakened in the middle of one night in 1969 understanding what had been causing my struggle. The "all-at-once" was my answer.

The description of single constructs and single examples originally had felt unrelated to the reality of the nurse's world. They oversimplified its complexity. The nature of nursing was complex. It seemed to me that we needed, as a profession, constructs that simplified and allowed clear communications. We, also, needed constructs that conveyed the reality and complexity of the {110} worlds in which nurses nursed. Perhaps a description of what "all-at-once" expressed for me would convey to others the lived-unobservable-worlds of nurses.

Nurses relate to other man in situations of "all-at-once." The "all-at-once" is equated by me to Buber's "I-Thou" and "I-It" occurring simultaneously and not only in sequence as he expressed it. These two ways that man can relate to and come to know his world and himself demand sequential expression for clear communication. However, the responsible authentic nurse in the nursing arena lives them "all-at-once." Aware of the multifarious multiplicities of her responses to another and at once to the surrounding field of action, the nurse selects and overtly expresses her responses that actualize the purpose, values, and potential of the artful science of professional nursing.

Awareness of the multifarious multiplicities affecting the other and the self in the nursing arena is a component of "I-Thou" relating. Selectively overtly expressing concordantly with the purpose, values, and potential of nursing necessitates a looking at, which is a component of "I-It" relating, while acting and being. Therefore both "I-Thou and I-It" modes of being are "all-at-once."

This necessity for a nurse's duality in her mode of being came to my awareness through comparing Gilbert' and Muller's works, studying Buber's conceptions of man, and considering them in relation to my current and past lived-experiences in the nursing-arena. In my nursing world of "I-Thou" relating reflection is called forth prior to my overt response to allow response selection concordant with my nursing purpose. The very character of multifarious multiplicities of the nursing world undoubtedly has called for nurses to develop their human capacity for duality in their mode of being.

To make these "multifarious multiplicities" explicit I would like to offer a description of a recent, personal nursing experience. In a community psychiatric mental health psychosocial clinic, I sat across from and focused on relating with a psychiatric client. After long years of hospitalization he was now living in a community foster home and visiting the clinic three days a week. When there was no special clinic activity in progress and often even when there was, he sat by himself and played poker. He told me about his game many times, over weeks and months. He dealt out five poker hands. Each hand was dealt to a member of his family, long dead. He did not accept their deadness. One day while describing the poker games and his relatives, he intermittently expressed his fantasies which he projected on to a sweet cheerful 65-year-old community volunteer. She was somewhat deaf. His fantasies were angry. When he gestured toward her, she in a motherly way came over to him, put her arm around him, and her ear down to his mouth. It was a moment of possible client explosion. With my eyes I attempted to communicate with her. This, and the tone of the patient's voice warned her to move away. While this was occurring another patient jealous of my attentions to this patient walked up and down, and in passing negatively commented on the religious background of the man I was sitting with. In the rear of the room a dietician was conducting a group on obesity. And all of this was set to the {111} melodious, sanguine strains of "If I Loved You" being poorly beat out on a piano about ten feet away by another volunteer accompanied in song by a few clients. Meanwhile two staff nurses were observing my part in all this since I was labeled "expert." The client did support me that day and responded to my staying with him. Much to my surprise he began playing poker with me. He dealt me out a hand. This was, at this time, a new behavior on his part. It was movement toward his potential for relating to live persons in his current world. This, again, is just one example of the multifarious multiplicities of one very common type of nursing situation.

The inference from the above is that professional artistic-scientific nurses relate in "I-Thou, I-It, all-at-once" to the specific general, critical nonconsequential, and the healthy ill. This presents a paradoxical dilemma. Nurses, as human beings, have a highly developed capacity for living "all-at-once" in and with the flow of the multifarious multiplicities of their worlds. Nurses, as human beings, like all other human beings, are limited to thinking, interpreting, and expressing conceptually only in succession.

This metaphoric synthetic construct, "all-at-once," has allowed me to better convey how I experience the health nursing situation. It also has aided my understanding of the multifarious multiplicity