Have you ever thought about what fiction is? Probably, such a question may seem surprising: and so everything is clear. Every person throughout his life has to repeatedly create the works he needs for specific purposes - statements, autobiographies, dictations - using not gypsum or clay, not musical notes, not paints, but just a word. At the same time, almost every person will be very surprised if he is told that he thereby created a work of fiction, which is very different from visual art, music and sculpture making. However, everyone understands that a student's essay or dictation is fundamentally different from novels, short stories, news that are created by professional writers. In the works of professionals there is the most important difference - excogitation. But, oddly enough, in a school literature course, you don’t realize the full power of fiction. So using our website in your free time discover fiction for yourself. Look at that by - (read ebook pdf .txt) 📖
- Author: -
- Performer: -
Book online «Look at that by - (read ebook pdf .txt) 📖». Author -
63 Wordplay between crafty (πανούργος panourgos) and Pan-ourgias.
1) Yes, but what exactly does mastur-writing mean? Writing with the intention of self-satisfaction or writing a whole load of bullshit, the reader will reasonably ask.
2) You have the green light. There are no answers on the internet on this.
Simos Panopoulos - Look at that
215
computer which, when, God willing, the end comes, no one is able to open without a password.
Simos Panopoulos - Look at that
216
Epilogue
Much like any dissertation that does not content itself by simply muddling through things, regurgitating and at best confirming already acknowledged findings, but which instead aspires to reach the marrow, Ster-giou’s one passed through many stages before finally being presented in front of a board of professors of his university, stages which we presented above, as we consider how they present a certain epistemic interest. Its reception was at minimum lukewarm. Stergiou’s obsessive emphasis on an obsolete and vulgar biog-raphism, which did not even, as one would expect, rely on evidence drawn from Panopoulos’ biography but on arbitrary interpretations of it through the form of Apostolis, provoked a highly negative impression. Distressing - his almost detective-like research of all the dessous on the how, the why, the where, the when and the whence of his work. Pathetic - his psycholo-gizing and thoughtless radiographic focus on it. Con-sidering it differently then, instead of a monography, a hagiography, there was no way, not even as a joke,
Comments (0)