Aaron's Rod by D. H. Lawrence (best young adult book series txt) đ
- Author: D. H. Lawrence
- Performer: -
Book online «Aaron's Rod by D. H. Lawrence (best young adult book series txt) đ». Author D. H. Lawrence
âI suppose no one will steal from the overcoat pockets,â he said, as he sat down.
âMy dear chap, theyâd steal the gold filling out of your teeth, if you happened to yawn,â said Argyle. âWhy, have you left valuables in your overcoat?â
âMy flute,â said Aaron.
âOh, they wonât steal that,â said Argyle.
âBesides,â said Lilly, âwe should see anyone who touched it.â
And so they settled down to the vermouth.
âWell,â said Argyle, âwhat have you been doing with yourself, eh? I havenât seen a glimpse of you for a week. Been going to the dogs, eh?â
âOr the bitches,â said Aaron.
âOh, but look here, thatâs bad! Thatâs bad! I can see I shall have to take you in hand, and commence my work of reform. Oh, Iâm a great reformer, a Zwingli and Savonarola in one. I couldnât count the number of people Iâve led into the right way. It takes some finding, you know. Strait is the gateâdamned strait sometimes. A damned tight squeeze. . . .â Argyle was somewhat intoxicated. He spoke with a slight slur, and laughed, really tickled at his own jokes. The man Levison smiled acquiescent. But Lilly was not listening. His brow was heavy and he seemed abstracted. He hardly noticed Aaronâs arrival.
âDid you see the row yesterday?â asked Levison.
âNo,â said Aaron. âWhat was it?â
It was the socialists. They were making a demonstration against the imprisonment of one of the railway-strikers. I was there. They went on all right, with a good bit of howling and gibing: a lot of young louts, you know. And the shop-keepers shut up shop, and nobody showed the Italian flag, of course. Well, when they came to the Via Benedetto Croce, there were a few mounted carabinieri. So they stopped the procession, and the sergeant said that the crowd could continue, could go on where they liked, but would they not go down the Via Verrocchio, because it was being repaired, the roadway was all up, and there were piles of cobble stones. These might prove a temptation and lead to trouble. So would the demonstrators not take that roadâthey might take any other they liked.âWell, the very moment he had finished, there was a revolver shot, he made a noise, and fell forward over his horseâs nose. One of the anarchists had shot him. Then there was hell let loose, the carabinieri fired back, and people were bolting and fighting like devils. I cleared out, myself. But my Godâwhat do you think of it?â
âSeems pretty mean,â said Aaron.
âMean!âHe had just spoken them fairâthey could go where they liked, only would they not go down the one road, because of the heap of stones. And they let him finish. And then shot him dead.â
âWas he dead?â said Aaron.
âYesâkilled outright, the Nazione says.â
There was a silence. The drinkers in the cafe all continued to talk vehemently, casting uneasy glances.
âWell,â said Argyle, âif you let loose the dogs of war, you mustnât expect them to come to heel again in five minutes.â
âBut thereâs no fair play about it, not a bit,â said Levison.
âAh, my dear fellow, are you still so young and callow that you cherish the illusion of fair play?â said Argyle.
âYes, I am,â said Levison.
âLive longer and grow wiser,â said Argyle, rather contemptuously.
âAre you a socialist?â asked Levison.
âAm I my aunt Tabithaâs dachshund bitch called Bella,â said Argyle, in his musical, indifferent voice. âYes, Bellaâs her name. And if you can tell me a damneder name for a dog, I shall listen, I assure you, attentively.â
âBut you havenât got an aunt called Tabitha,â said Aaron.
âHavenât I? Oh, havenât I? Iâve got TWO aunts called Tabitha: if not more.â
âThey arenât of any vital importance to you, are they?â said Levison.
âNot the very least in the worldâif it hadnât been that my elder Aunt Tabitha had christened her dachshund bitch Bella. I cut myself off from the family after that. Oh, I turned over a new leaf, with not a family name on it. Couldnât stand Bella amongst the rest.â
âYou must have strained most of the gnats out of your drink, Argyle,â said Lilly, laughing.
âAssiduously! Assiduously! I canât stand these little vermin. Oh, I am quite indifferent about swallowing a camel or twoâor even a whole string of dromedaries. How charmingly Eastern that sounds! But gnats! Not for anything in the world would I swallow one.â
âYouâre a bit of a SOCIALIST though, arenât you?â persisted Levison, now turning to Lilly.
âNo,â said Lilly. âI was.â
âAnd am no more,â said Argyle sarcastically. âMy dear fellow, the only hope of salvation for the world lies in the re-institution of slavery.â
âWhat kind of slavery?â asked Levison.
âSlavery! SLAVERY! When I say SLAVERY I donât mean any of your damned modern reform cant. I mean solid sound slavery on which the Greek and the Roman world rested. FAR finer worlds than ours, my dear chap! Oh FAR finer! And canât be done without slavery. Simply canât be done.â Oh, theyâll all come to realise it, when theyâve had a bit more of this democratic washer-women business.â
Levison was laughing, with a slight sneer down his nose. âAnyhow, thereâs no immediate dangerâor hope, if you prefer itâof the re- instituting of classic slavery,â he said.
âUnfortunately no. We are all such fools,â said Argyle.
âBesides,â said Levison, âwho would you make slaves of?â
âEverybody, my dear chap: beginning with the idealists and the theorising Jews, and after them your nicely-bred gentlemen, and then perhaps, your profiteers and Rothschilds, and ALL politicians, and ending up with the proletariat,â said Argyle.
âThen who would be the masters?âthe professional classes, doctors and lawyers and so on?â
âWhat? Masters. They would be the sewerage slaves, as being those who had made most smells.â There was a momentâs silence.
âThe only fault I have to find with your system,â said Levison, rather acidly, âis that there would be only one master, and everybody else slaves.â
âDo you call that a fault? What do you want with more than one master? Are you asking for several?âWell, perhaps thereâs cunning in THAT.â Cunning devils, cunning devils, these theorising slavesââ And Argyle pushed his face with a devilish leer into Aaronâs face. âCunning devils!â he reiterated, with a slight tipsy slur. âThat be-fouled Epictetus wasnât the last of âemânor the first. Oh, not by any means, not by any means.â
Here Lilly could not avoid a slight spasm of amusement. âBut returning to serious conversation,â said Levison, turning his rather sallow face to Lilly. âI think youâll agree with me that socialism is the inevitable next stepââ
Lilly waited for some time without answering. Then he said, with unwilling attention to the question: âI suppose itâs the logically inevitable next step.â
âUse logic as lavatory paper,â cried Argyle harshly. âYesâlogically inevitableâand humanly inevitable at the same time. Some form of socialism is bound to come, no matter how you postpone it or try variations,â said Levison.
âAll right, let it come,â said Lilly. âItâs not my affair, neither to help it nor to keep it back, or even to try varying it.â
âThere I donât follow you,â said Levison. âSuppose you were in Russia nowââ
âI watch it Iâm not.â
âBut youâre in Italy, which isnât far off. Supposing a socialist revolution takes place all around you. Wonât that force the problem on you?âIt is every manâs problem,â persisted Levison.
âNot mine,â said Lilly.
âHow shall you escape it?â said Levison.
âBecause to me it is no problem. To Bolsh or not to Bolsh, as far as my mind goes, presents no problem. Not any more than to be or not to be. To be or not to be is simply no problemââ
âNo, I quite agree, that since you are already existing, and since death is ultimately inevitable, to be or not to be is no sound problem,â said Levison. âBut the parallel isnât true of socialism. That is not a problem of existence, but of a certain mode of existence which centuries of thought and action on the part of Europe have now made logically inevitable for Europe. And therefore there is a problem. There is more than a problem, there is a dilemma. Either we must go to the logical conclusionâorââ
âSomewhere else,â said Lilly.
âYesâyes. Precisely! But where ELSE? Thatâs the one half of the problem: supposing you do not agree to a logical progression in human social activity. Because after all, human society through the course of ages only enacts, spasmodically but still inevitably, the logical development of a given idea.â
âWell, then, I tell you.âThe idea and the ideal has for me gone deadâ dead as carrionââ
âWhich idea, which ideal precisely?â
âThe ideal of love, the ideal that it is better to give than to receive, the ideal of liberty, the ideal of the brotherhood of man, the ideal of the sanctity of human life, the ideal of what we call goodness, charity, benevolence, public spirited-ness, the ideal of sacrifice for a cause, the ideal of unity and unanimityâall the lotâall the whole beehive of idealsâhas all got the modern bee- disease, and gone putrid, stinking.âAnd when the ideal is dead and putrid, the logical sequence is only stink.âWhich, for me, is the truth concerning the ideal of good, peaceful, loving humanity and its logical sequence in socialism and equality, equal opportunity or whatever you like.âBut this time he stinkethâand Iâm sorry for any Christus who brings him to life again, to stink livingly for another thirty years: the beastly Lazarus of our idealism.â
âThat may be true for youââ
âBut itâs true for nobody else,â said Lilly. âAll the worse for them. Let them die of the bee-disease.â
âNot only that,â persisted Levison, âbut what is your alternative? Is it merely nihilism?â
âMy alternative,â said Lilly, âis an alternative for no one but myself, so Iâll keep my mouth shut about it.â
âThat isnât fair.â
âI tell you, the ideal of fairness stinks with the rest.âI have no obligation to say what I think.â
âYes, if you enter into conversation, you haveââ
âBah, then I didnât enter into conversation.âThe only thing is, I agree in the rough with Argyle. Youâve got to have a sort of slavery again. People are not MEN: they are insects and instruments, and their destiny is slavery. They are too many for me, and so what I think is ineffectual. But ultimately they will be brought to agreeâ after sufficient exterminationâand then they will elect for themselves a proper and healthy and energetic slavery.â
âI should like to know what you mean by slavery. Because to me it is impossible that slavery should be healthy and energetic. You seem to have some other idea in your mind, and you merely use the word slavery out of exasperationââ
âI mean it none the less. I mean a real committal of the life-issue of inferior beings to the responsibility of a superior being.â
Comments (0)