Covid-19 - The Lies and the Fraud by Terence Smart (best e book reader .txt) 📖

report the results from the parents, who entered data on a total of 25,930 children. The average wearing time of the mask was 270 minutes per day. Impairments caused by wearing the mask were reported by 68% of the parents. These included irritability (60%), headache (53%), difficulty concentrating (50%), less happiness (49%), reluctance to go to school/kindergarten (44%), malaise (42%) impaired learning (38%) and drowsiness or fatigue (37%)."

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/mask-harms-kids-68-parents-report-alarming-problems-first-its-kind-study-preprint1

Children have to be kept in year group bubbles in school because they are told they could all have the virus and be spreading it (Lie 2) or they have to wear masks (Lie 3) and sit two meters apart from other children because although they have no symptoms they could be spreading a virus (Lie 2). It’s nothing but Psychological abuse of children also masks being forced on children for hours each day is causing them harm.

The following article goes into great detail that the wearing of masks by everyone can worsen contamination rather than reduce it?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wearing-the-face-mask-who-is-putting-our-children-at-risk-sars-cov-2-or-the-actions-of-our-governments/5723961

“There is a lack of official recognition in the media or in government reports of all the deleterious effects of the continuous wearing of masks, as if the most important thing is to do everything possible to get people to allow themselves to be masked, regardless of the consequences. This particularly concerns children and adolescents whose brains, especially emotional and relational brains, are in full development! Children depend largely on facial expressions to understand and apprehend their environment. Hiding the lower half of the face diminishes the ability to communicate, interpret and imitate the expressions of those we come into contact with. Positive emotions become less recognizable and negative emotions are amplified. Emotional mimicry, contagion and emotionality in general are reduced as well as teacher-student bonding, group cohesion and learning – of which emotions are a major driver. The benefits and risks associated with the continued wearing of masks at school should be seriously studied, considered and made clear and obvious to all teachers, parents and students. From a medical and human perspective, it is serious that our rulers do not report these complications and do not take them into account before dictating their measures to the population”. – Dr Pascal Sacre – globalresearch.ca

“To deprive a child's or an adolescent's brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed. For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it is has so much to learn. The child's brain, or the youth's brain, is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires. In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active. The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don't need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Consciously and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication. - Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD is a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist with a PhD in Pharmacology, with special interest in neurotoxicology.

https://www.sott.net/article/442455-German-Neurologist-Warns-Against-Wearing-Facemasks-Oxygen-Deprivation-Causes-Permanent-Neurological-Damage

Not forgetting the fact that children’s lives are not under threat from Covid as in the U.K only 4 children have died out of 12 million school children under 20 years old from Covid or after testing positive from Covid which does not actually mean that they had covid.

Dr. Jim Meehan has produced an article called ‘An Evidence Based Scientific Analysis of Why Masks are Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful’ and it outlines most of the scientific evidence which states quite clearly mask do not stop the spread of a virus. It is a political decision which is not based on scientific evidence. It is used to keep the fear of a deadly virus among the population so that they will accept the draconian lockdowns and the vaccine.

Dr. Jim Meehan is an ophthalmologist and preventive medicine specialist with over 20 years of experience and advanced training in immunology, inflammation, and infectious disease. Dr. Meehan is also trained in internal medicine, addiction medicine, endocrinology, integrative medicine, functional medicine, and nutrition. Dr. Meehan is a former editor of the medical journal, “Ocular Immunology and Inflammation.” Dr. Meehan has peer-reviewed thousands of medical research studies.

Dr. Meehan’s document can be viewed or downloaded at: https://covileaks.co.uk/the-truth

Below are some of the highlights from the article.

As you will learn from the material that follows, the evidence for and against masks should not be confusing. The evidence is clear, masks are ineffective, unnecessary, and harmful. What’s happening in the world today, including the misinformation surrounding community mask wearing, is about political agendas, symbolism, and fear, not science. To clear up the confusion, I will argue that the scientific evidence not only does not support the community wearing of face masks, but the evidence shows that healthy people wearing face masks pose serious health risks to wearers. If the scientific literature demonstrated that masks were effective, then why, early in the pandemic, did public health experts tell the public not to wear them?

The public is being repeatedly misinformed by catchy (guilt and fear based) marketing messages designed to promote the social responsibility (or guilt) to wear masks as a form of source control: “I wear my mask for you and you wear your mask for me.” Where is the evidence for these claims? On the websites where these unscientific marketing messages are found, there are never references to science that supports the claims. In fact, despite almost everything that has been drilled into the public psyche regarding masks, has little to know basis in science and absolutely no robust support from the highest-level evidence based research. Masks have never been proven to protect either the wearer or the community from the transmission of respiratory pathogens. Mask mandates during a pandemic are opposed by decades of high level science. Simply put, the public is being misled by fraudulent claims supported with weak pseudoscience.

• Decades of the highest-level scientific evidence (meta-analyses of multiple randomized controlled trials) overwhelmingly conclude that medical masks are ineffective at preventing the transmission of respiratory viruses, including SAR-CoV-2.

• Those arguing for masks are relying on low-level evidence (observational retrospective trials and mechanistic theories), none of which are powered to counter the evidence, arguments, and risks of mask mandates.

• The majority of the population is at very low to almost no risk of severe or lethal disease from CoVID-19. Children are at an extraordinarily low risk of dying from CoVID-19. Based on CDC published data, 99.99815% of children that contract CoVID-19 survive.

•Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among children in schools and is very rare.

• Masks worn properly are well documented to cause harm to their wearers. Masks worn improperly, re-used, or contaminated are dangerous.

• Any reasonable risk to benefit analysis of medical masks concludes that the risks overwhelmingly outweigh the benefits.

• Children are at imminent risk of harm from mask mandates. Masks are Unnecessary. Fear and Politics are Subverting Science and Reason. Masking Children in Schools is Unnecessary – So Says the Science. In fact, the overwhelming weight of scientific literature to date establishes that face masks do not prevent the spread of COVID-19 by, to, or from, children.

•Masking School Children is Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Harmful. Mandatory masks in school are a ‘major threat’ to children’s’ health, doctors warn. Forcing Children to Wear Masks in Schools is Unnecessary. Forcing Children to Wear Masks for Long Periods Risks Causing Them Physical Harm. Forcing Children to Wear Masks for Long Periods Risks Causing Them Mental and Psychological Harm

Forcing children to wear face masks in school is ineffective, harmful, and unnecessary. The risk of CoVID-19 in children is so low (see, “Masks are Unnecessary” above) that any imagined benefits cannot possibly outweigh the risks. Based on CDC data, the risk of children between the ages of zero and 19 years of age dying from CoVID-19 is an incredibly low risk of 0.00195%. This rate is much lower than the risk of children dying from influenza. In fact, there is a large and growing body of physicians, paediatricians, scientists, epidemiologists, and researchers around the world that are speaking out against the anti-scientific public health recommendations that have been forced upon the public and our children. Those of us that have read the science have concluded that it is senseless and dangerous to force children to wear face masks in school:

https://www.meehanmd.com/blog/post/173679/an-evidence-based-scientific-analysis-of-why-masks-are-ineffective-unnecessary-and-harmful

A July 2020 review by the University of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine found that there is no evidence that cloth masks are at all effective against virus infection or transmission.
• Jefferson, Tom & Heneghan, Carl, Masking lack of evidence with
politics, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, July 23, 2020. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidencewith-politics/

A July 2020 study by Japanese researchers found that cloth masks “offer zero
protection against coronavirus.”
• Naoya Kon, Cloth face masks offer zero shield against virus, a study shows, The Asahi Shimbun, study by Kazunari Onishi. http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/13523664

“This experiment reconfirmed that wearing cloth and gauze masks can’t prevent virus infection.”
 

In an August 2020 article, Denis G. Rancourt, PhD, a Researcher, Ontario
Civil Liberties Association, debunks supposed “studies” purporting to support
compelled face mask use for the general population.
• See Rancourt, Face masks, lies, damn lies, and public health officials: “A growing body of evidence” August 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343399832_Face_masks_lies_damn_lies_and_public_hea

 

CDC Study Finds Overwhelming Majority of People Getting Coronavirus Wore Masks

There is increasing evidence that cloth masks not only may be ineffective against stopping coronavirus transmission, but that they may actually increase the spread of the virus, as well as worsening other health conditions. A September report by the CDC found that more than 70 percent of COVID-positive patients contracted the virus in spite of faithful mask wearing while in public. Moreover, 14 percent of the patients who said they “often” wore masks were also infected. Meanwhile, just four percent of the COVID-positive patients said they “never” wore masks in the 14 days before the onset of their illness. Likewise, the CDC’s October journal report references a 2015 study on cloth mask efficacy that found that rates of infection were “consistently higher” among those in the cloth mask group versus that of the medical mask and control groups. The authors of the study suggested it was likely that the cloth masks were problematic because they retained moisture and had poor filtration.

The CDC writes of that study, “This finding suggest that risk for infection was higher for those wearing cloth masks.”

https://thenewamerican.com/cdc-admits-no-conclusive-evidence-cloth-masks-work-against-covid/

https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/12/cdc-study-finds-overwhelming-majority-of-people-getting-coronavirus-wore-masks/

Noted Physician Makes Definitive Moral Case Against Mask Mandates

Yes, I am sorry that you have been told over the last year that masks don’t reduce oxygen, by emphatic and dogmatic people, but the fact remains that oxygen deficit during mask-wearing is very thoroughly established in peer-reviewed clinical data.  Here[1], here[2] and here[3], for example.

And yes, surgeons also suffer from deoxygenation.[4]  Excess of carbon dioxide, as it accumulates inside a mask, also is a mild poisoning of the entire body, and this is also established in clinical data. [5] [6]  So if you demand that a child, a worker, a traveler, a consumer or anyone else wear a mask, you have been demanding that they mildly poison themselves.

I know this is vexing for some to read, but you cannot inflict harm with any moral authority, and you need to stop that now that you know it’s a problem, if you want to be able to live with yourself, or to exist peacefully with a good conscience.

But what about viruses?

What about them?  There are trillions of viruses on our skin.[7]  Must all skin be covered? Light, airborne, breeze-carried, aerosolized viruses have wafted through the mesh of masks, and shot out the side jets under people’s ears so consistently for the last year, that masked populations have had higher rates of COVID-19 than unmasked populations.[8]

Covid has a 99.74% survival rate among even those who take none of the