Other
Read books online » Other » Mutual Aid Peter Kropotkin (ebook reader 7 inch TXT) 📖

Book online «Mutual Aid Peter Kropotkin (ebook reader 7 inch TXT) 📖». Author Peter Kropotkin



1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 108
Go to page:
Ireland, Wales and Scotland.”204 Even in the sixteenth century we find that common purchases of corn were made for the “comoditie and profitt in all things of this.⁠ ⁠… Citie and Chamber of London, and of all the Citizens and Inhabitants of the same as moche as in us lieth”⁠—as the Mayor wrote in 1565.205 In Venice, the whole of the trade in corn is well known to have been in the hands of the city; the “quarters,” on receiving the cereals from the board which administrated the imports, being bound to send to every citizen’s house the quantity allotted to him.206 In France, the city of Amiens used to purchase salt and to distribute it to all citizens at cost price;207 and even now one sees in many French towns the halles which formerly were municipal depots for corn and salt.208 In Russia it was a regular custom in Novgorod and Pskov.

The whole matter relative to the communal purchases for the use of the citizens, and the manner in which they used to be made, seems not to have yet received proper attention from the historians of the period; but there are here and there some very interesting facts which throw a new light upon it. Thus there is, among Mr. Gross’s documents, a Kilkenny ordinance of the year 1367, from which we learn how the prices of the goods were established. “The merchants and the sailors,” Mr. Gross writes, “were to state on oath the first cost of the goods and the expenses of transportation. Then the mayor of the town and two discreet men were to name the price at which the wares were to be sold.” The same rule held good in Thurso for merchandise coming “by sea or land.” This way of “naming the price” so well answers to the very conceptions of trade which were current in medieval times that it must have been all but universal. To have the price established by a third person was a very old custom; and for all interchange within the city it certainly was a widely-spread habit to leave the establishment of prices to “discreet men”⁠—to a third party⁠—and not to the vendor or the buyer. But this order of things takes us still further back in the history of trade⁠—namely, to a time when trade in staple produce was carried on by the whole city, and the merchants were only the commissioners, the trustees, of the city for selling the goods which it exported. A Waterford ordinance, published also by Mr. Gross, says “that all manere of marchandis what so ever kynde thei be of⁠ ⁠… shal be bought by the Maire and balives which bene commene biers [common buyers, for the town] for the time being, and to distribute the same on freemen of the citie (the propre goods of free citisains and inhabitants only excepted).” This ordinance can hardly be explained otherwise than by admitting that all the exterior trade of the town was carried on by its agents. Moreover, we have direct evidence of such having been the case for Novgorod and Pskov. It was the Sovereign Novgorod and the Sovereign Pskov who sent their caravans of merchants to distant lands.

We know also that in nearly all medieval cities of Middle and Western Europe, the craft guilds used to buy, as a body, all necessary raw produce, and to sell the produce of their work through their officials, and it is hardly possible that the same should not have been done for exterior trade⁠—the more so as it is well known that up to the thirteenth century, not only all merchants of a given city were considered abroad as responsible in a body for debts contracted by any one of them, but the whole city as well was responsible for the debts of each one of its merchants. Only in the twelfth and thirteenth century the towns on the Rhine entered into special treaties abolishing this responsibility.209 And finally we have the remarkable Ipswich document published by Mr. Gross, from which document we learn that the merchant guild of this town was constituted by all who had the freedom of the city, and who wished to pay their contribution (“their hanse”) to the guild, the whole community discussing all together how better to maintain the merchant guild, and giving it certain privileges. The merchant guild of Ipswich thus appears rather as a body of trustees of the town than as a common private guild.

In short, the more we begin to know the medieval city the more we see that it was not simply a political organization for the protection of certain political liberties. It was an attempt at organizing, on a much grander scale than in a village community, a close union for mutual aid and support, for consumption and production, and for social life altogether, without imposing upon men the fetters of the State, but giving full liberty of expression to the creative genius of each separate group of individuals in art, crafts, science, commerce, and political organization. How far this attempt has been successful will be best seen when we have analyzed in the next chapter the organization of labour in the medieval city and the relations of the cities with the surrounding peasant population.

VI Mutual Aid in the Medieval City (Continued)

Likeness and diversity among the medieval cities⁠—The craftguilds: State-attributes in each of them⁠—Attitude of the city towards the peasants; attempts to free them⁠—The lords⁠—Results achieved by the medieval city: in arts, in learning⁠—Causes of decay.

The medieval cities were not organized upon some preconceived plan in obedience to the will of an outside legislator. Each of them was a natural growth in the full sense of the word⁠—an always varying result of struggle between various forces which adjusted and readjusted themselves in conformity with their relative energies, the chances of

1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 108
Go to page:

Free ebook «Mutual Aid Peter Kropotkin (ebook reader 7 inch TXT) 📖» - read online now

Comments (0)

There are no comments yet. You can be the first!
Add a comment