Non vowel resources of some good mood by Alexander Borodin (best ebook reader for surface pro txt) 📖

of psychological warfare, criticism is the creation of psychological traps) your idea or action, or you can listen to criticism of critics, but very carefully, otherwise nothing new will be created, because the new this is new, they should always be criticized in theory. Those who created something new did not listen to anyone? An example is, if I am not mistaken, of Hobolt with his version of the lunar docking. According to historical data, he was laughed at when he proposed it, but this happened, what Hobolt was talking about, and if he fixed himself on criticism and, as a result, doubted the correctness of his reasoning, there would be nothing: breaking stereotypes and creating new ones is what a new thought does, a new thought becomes a new truth. The idea of ​​the existence of the so-called Hicks field was rejected by the scientist Peter Hicks, but was still accepted. Tsialkovsky, according to historical data, a deaf teacher, was criticized for his idea of ​​creating an aircraft that would be heavier than air, and now cargo planes can transport a train, in the sense of the train itself, without cars and tanks that are attached to it during their transportation. The superiors of the actions of the surgeon Vladimir Demekhov criticized the dog for a second head from another dog, the management wrote complaints about him calling the doctor a schizophrenic, so in this case the saying “the dog barks, the caravan goes on” or “teach your woman to cook,” when someone criticizes and teaches how to do something, in his opinion, correctly, this saying will be very appropriate, but in general let them criticize, on health, it is noticed that, as a rule, those who criticize others do not time left to criticize myself Or they themselves do not criticize, because they consider themselves perfect, if can afford to criticize others, and these critics themselves can "grab" of grief because of the lack of proper criticism. Many are not offended by critics, as bandits say: “Why touch him? It’ll fly by itself. ” So it is, the majority has a long life, since medicine is now developed, earlier life expectancy was 18-20 years, and who were 40, they were considered old people, and therefore there is an opportunity, since life is long compared to past times , to see how the one who offended you “flies”, by itself, without your intervention.

An example of such a critic, who studied at a trade school and is now an adult: one girl criticized another girl for giving birth at 16 years old, and then she gives birth at 14 years old.

Some, as they say, “break down” even without someone’s criticism, with the help of self-criticism, for example, I want to write a book, but you think there are a lot of writers. Yes, it is possible that on a civilized continent there will be people who want to create a work by expressing their thoughts in it, but there is also Africa, where in some of its places, due to difficult living conditions, people cannot think of anything else but how to survive, and in civilized states there are not many competitors in terms of publishing any ideas, but maybe, on the contrary, different sources say different things. The population of some civilized countries from self-sufficiency for the most part thinks how to have fun, therefore, as the paratroopers say, "None but us." Who will fulfill the task assigned to the paratroopers, except for themselves, who is stronger in spirit than themselves? So if you want to write something - write.

By the way, a higher continent, probably, created a continent such as Africa, where people are not spoiled, Europe is in dire need of labor, everyone knows that the European population will not go to the work that emigrants will do, for example, from that Africa or from some other poor continent. Is Africa a continent that supplies fresh power to Europe, Europe’s fuel? Therefore, when someone says “Don’t bring bullshit”, it can only say that the person who says this phrase simply knows some methods of psychological warfare, manipulation methods, maybe even on an unconscious level, but doesn’t say about his rightness, does it mean that Europe is a lot of “players” or service workers who understand that you can learn to talk and convince, and this will save them from physical labor?

There are work collectives, mainly among IT-employees, where there is no discipline, and almost anarchy at work. But often in other groups where discipline is required, there is someone who violates it, and it is due to such violators of the discipline that those who do not violate it are promoted, these are usually those who are called opportunists, since all the attention of the leadership focuses on those who do not discipline. Against the backdrop of these contrasts, the so-called opportunists are advancing through the ranks, perhaps not being as smart as those who are undisciplined. If there were no undisciplined ones, it would be much more difficult for those who did not violate discipline, since it would be impossible to stand out, and the presence of discipline in them would become more noticeable to the leadership and others in the absence of discipline from others. It’s like in a war - if there hadn’t been, then there would have been no heroes.

Attention, this is an affirmative sentence: the following is not a guide to action, it is just a quote from the author of several models of behavior in various situations that were recorded when used by strangers to the author.

The German general for a Russian soldier of the WWII is no one, the end to some considered negative authorities, since the retinue does the king? Sometimes or always you need to think in terms of "profitable - unprofitable"? If it’s emotional, then is it recommended to either redo it, or restrain oneself or minimize communication with people who are considered to be emotional people themselves?

I watched how the author’s acquaintance acted (in what follows we will call him) when what happened to be called rudeness happened to him, for example. Someone said something unpleasant when meeting with him (using “jokes”) - the way he saw the author not to spoil his mood when meeting with such a person and even raise him — this, without answering anything, move away from him if he met, for example, at a bus stop. If the author’s acquaintance met with an unpleasant person on the street, and it was impossible not to say hello to him, since it would look ridiculous, and this would not be in favor of the author’s friend, then this author’s friend, walking towards him, said curses to himself, so that the person walking towards him could understand this, seeing how the author’s acquaintance moves his lips with a serious look, curses (but the opponent shouldn’t hear anything), and as soon as the author’s acquaintance caught up with his annoying person, a serious displeased face he immediately changed for a friendly and greeted, the person who enjoys the “tricks” understood everything, and the acquaintance of the author enjoyed this - the release of internal natural opiates into the blood went.

And in general, we need to take an example from some large leaders - these people know all the “undercurrents”, they do not suppress their interests, or rather, sometimes suppress because of the need, since they cannot be realized at the moment, but they still apply everything efforts for their implementation (using intellectual to implement emotional), for this they have a whole staff of call phrases, and a person who is not a leader should have a base that stimulates and motivates someone for any actions, phrases and words and a kind at internal army and special services to realize his needs and interests.

Just as some bosses wait instead of a working wizard - so do people wait not for a leader, but for a wizard? Alcohol is sold in stores, there are two days off - any state gives a maximum for a person to feel comfortable, but there are those for which a comfortable existence needs something that is unacceptable to others, and will never be so comfortable in those a framework in which others are comfortable? The CCleaner computer program can be not only a computer program - we erase bits of information and unnecessary information in our heads so that there is no “mess” in my head? A person with certain beliefs cannot work in certain places, since these beliefs will interfere with work?

For a long time on television, graffiti on the corridors of one of the business universities showed that there was no morality, only money, such a kind of deprogramming, “reloading” students in a different way, because someone invented morality, it’s some kind of thought for some reason, others must listen to them and adhere to them, as someone said that this is true, but any person can have their own morality, and there can be as many moralities as there are inhabitants on planet Earth (as they say lawyers - how much to lawyers, there are so many opinions), and everyone can say that it is his morality that must be adhered to, but this does not mean that everyone will follow it - morality in its classical sense, they, students of the above institution, future managers and businessmen, will only harm?

Some military men are faced with the dilemma of killing or not killing someone they consider an enemy, there is such a peculiar, as mentioned above, conflict of programs, dissonance, from childhood it was suggested to everyone that killing is something out of the ordinary, but that's it on the contrary, if you don’t kill, you can go to jail or pay with your life. Hence, probably, the so-called post - traumatic stress disorders, intrapersonal conflicts, how can one involuntarily conclude that some whose work is to educate people play an important role in the emergence of mental disorders? This, as already mentioned, as two people who met in prison, one another says:

"I am here for the murder, and you for what?" "And I for refusing to kill, being in the war." This story shows how everything can be brought to the point of absurdity, and how everything is relative.

Does the Nassim Taleb Black Swan effect work?

This theory considers hard-to-predict, rare events, it can be interpreted as a theory of how likely it is that a black swan will appear in a room, in your apartment or in your house. There are other theories that can be called and which are called the theory of probability or relativity: yes, it’s bad that someone got to serve in a “hot spot”, but it is not known what would happen to him if he didn’t get there, suddenly he would go down the street, if you didn’t get into the army, and those who were called bandits would attack him and kill or something else negative would happen, and in a hot spot this might not happen, but they might kill, no one knows of employees in a hot spot, what could have happened to him if he had not been there, so everything is relative, entry There are pluses and minuses.

Another example from the category of what is called the theory of relativity - a visor on the balcony made by a neighbor because of her neighbor living in an apartment above, whom she called "cattle", as he often threw down the trash, saved his life or at least his health a cat of other neighbors, who, falling from the 5th floor, was hooked on this peak. Thanks to the "cattle" and the neighbor from the 3rd floor - everything is relative, and again everywhere have their pluses and minuses?

In a recently bought laptop, on which this material is currently being printed, an insignificant defect was found: when headphones or speakers are connected to it, the sound on the laptop itself does not turn off (the material is sometimes typed to music, music is one of the psychostimulants), although this should not be As a rule, the sound on the laptop and on other devices is muted when headphones or speakers are inserted into its jack. Having discovered this defect, you can go to the store and change the laptop to another, but