Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (read novel full TXT) 📖
- Author: Robert Tressell
- Performer: -
Book online «Ragged Trousered Philanthropists by Robert Tressell (read novel full TXT) 📖». Author Robert Tressell
Crossbones Boys’, which existed for the purpose of perpetuating the
great religious festival of Guy Fawkes. This association also came to
the aid of the unemployed and organized a Grand Fancy Dress Carnival
and Torchlight Procession. When this took place, although there was a
slight sprinkling of individuals dressed in tawdry costumes as
cavaliers of the time of Charles I, and a few more as highwaymen or
footpads, the majority of the processionists were boys in women’s
clothes, or wearing sacks with holes cut in them for their heads and
arms, and with their faces smeared with soot. There were also a
number of men carrying frying-pans in which they burnt red and blue
fire. The procession - or rather, mob - was headed by a band, and the
band was headed by two men, arm in arm, one very tall, dressed to
represent Satan, in red tights, with horns on his head, and smoking a
large cigar, and the other attired in the no less picturesque costume
of a bishop of the Established Church.
This crew paraded the town, howling and dancing, carrying flaring
torches, burning the blue and red fire, and some of them singing silly
or obscene songs; whilst the collectors ran about with the boxes
begging for money from people who were in most cases nearly as
poverty-stricken as the unemployed they were asked to assist. The
money thus obtained was afterwards handed over to the Secretary of the
Organized Benevolence Society, Mr Sawney Grinder.
Then there was the Soup Kitchen, which was really an inferior
eating-house in a mean street. The man who ran this was a relative of
the secretary of the OBS. He cadged all the ingredients for the soup
from different tradespeople: bones and scraps of meat from butchers:
pea meal and split peas from provision dealers: vegetables from
greengrocers: stale bread from bakers, and so on. Well-intentioned,
charitable old women with more money than sense sent him donations in
cash, and he sold the soup for a penny a basin - or a penny a quart to
those who brought jugs.
He had a large number of shilling books printed, each containing
thirteen penny tickets. The Organized Benevolence Society bought a
lot of these books and resold them to benevolent persons, or gave them
away to `deserving cases’. It was this connection with the OBS that
gave the Soup Kitchen a semi-official character in the estimation of
the public, and furnished the proprietor with the excuse for cadging
the materials and money donations.
In the case of the Soup Kitchen, as with the unemployed processions,
most of those who benefited were unskilled labourers or derelicts:
with but few exceptions the unemployed artisans - although their need
was just as great as that of the others - avoided the place as if it
were infected with the plague. They were afraid even to pass through
the street where it was situated lest anyone seeing them coming from
that direction should think they had been there. But all the same,
some of them allowed their children to go there by stealth, by night,
to buy some of this charity-tainted food.
Another brilliant scheme, practical and statesmanlike, so different
from the wild projects of demented Socialists, was started by the Rev.
Mr Bosher, a popular preacher, the Vicar of the fashionable Church of
the Whited Sepulchre. He collected some subscriptions from a number
of semi-imbecile old women who attended his church. With some of this
money he bought a quantity of timber and opened what he called a
Labour Yard, where he employed a number of men sawing firewood. Being
a clergyman, and because he said he wanted it for a charitable
purpose, of course he obtained the timber very cheaply - for about
half what anyone else would have had to pay for it.
The wood-sawing was done piecework. A log of wood about the size of a
railway sleeper had to be sawn into twelve pieces, and each of these
had to be chopped into four. For sawing and chopping one log in this
manner the worker was paid ninepence. One log made two bags of
firewood, which were sold for a shilling each - a trifle under the
usual price. The men who delivered the bags were paid three
halfpence for each two bags.
As there were such a lot of men wanting to do this work, no one was
allowed to do more than three lots in one day - that came to two
shillings and threepence - and no one was allowed to do more than two
days in one week.
The Vicar had a number of bills printed and displayed in shop windows
calling attention to what he was doing, and informing the public that
orders could be sent to the Vicarage by post and would receive prompt
attention and the fuel could be delivered at any address - Messrs
Rushton & Co. having very kindly lent a handcart for the use of the
men employed at the Labour Yard.
As a result of the appearance of this bill, and of the laudatory
notices in the columns of the Ananias, the Obscurer, and the
Chloroform - the papers did not mind giving the business a free
advertisement, because it was a charitable concern - many persons
withdrew their custom from those who usually supplied them with
firewood, and gave their orders to the Yard; and they had the
satisfaction of getting their fuel cheaper than before and of
performing a charitable action at the same time.
As a remedy for unemployment this scheme was on a par with the method
of the tailor in the fable who thought to lengthen his cloth by
cutting a piece off one end and sewing it on to the other; but there
was one thing about it that recommended it to the Vicar - it was
self-supporting. He found that there would be no need to use all the
money he had extracted from the semi-imbecile old ladies for timber,
so he bought himself a Newfoundland dog, an antique set of carved
ivory chessmen, and a dozen bottles of whisky with the remainder of
the cash.
The reverend gentleman hit upon yet another means of helping the poor.
He wrote a letter to the Weekly Chloroform appealing for castoff
boots for poor children. This was considered such a splendid idea
that the editors of all the local papers referred to it in leading
articles, and several other letters were written by prominent citizens
extolling the wisdom and benevolence of the profound Bosher. Most of
the boots that were sent in response to this appeal had been worn
until they needed repair - in a very large proportion of instances,
until they were beyond repair. The poor people to whom they were
given could not afford to have them mended before using them, and the
result was that the boots generally began to fall to pieces after a
few days’ wear.
This scheme amounted to very little. It did not increase the
number of castoff boots, and most of the people who `cast off’ their
boots generally gave them to someone or other. The only difference It
can have made was that possibly a few persons who usually threw their
boots away or sold them to second-hand dealers may have been induced
to send them to Mr Bosher instead. But all the same nearly everybody
said it was a splendid idea: its originator was applauded as a public
benefactor, and the pettifogging busybodies who amused themselves with
what they were pleased to term `charitable work’ went into imbecile
ecstasies over him.
The OBS
One of the most important agencies for the relief of distress was the
Organized Benevolence Society. This association received money from
many sources. The proceeds of the fancy-dress carnival; the
collections from different churches and chapels which held special
services in aid of the unemployed; the weekly collections made by the
employees of several local firms and business houses; the proceeds of
concerts, bazaars, and entertainments, donations from charitable
persons, and the subscriptions of the members. The society also
received large quantities of castoff clothing and boots, and tickets
of admission to hospitals, convalescent homes and dispensaries from
subscribers to those institutions, or from people like Rushton & Co.,
who had collecting-boxes in their workshops and offices.
Altogether during the last year the Society had received from various
sources about three hundred pounds in hard cash. This money was
devoted to the relief of cases of distress.
The largest item in the expenditure of the Society was the salary of
the General Secretary, Mr Sawney Grinder - a most deserving case - who
was paid one hundred pounds a year.
After the death of the previous secretary there were so many
candidates for the vacant post that the election of the new secretary
was a rather exciting affair. The excitement was all the more intense
because it was restrained. A special meeting of the society was held:
the Mayor, Alderman Sweater, presided, and amongst those present were
Councillors Rushton, Didlum and Grinder, Mrs Starvem, Rev. Mr Bosher,
a number of the rich, semi-imbecile old women who had helped to open
the Labour Yard, and several other `ladies’. Some of these were the
district visitors already alluded to, most of them the wives of
wealthy citizens and retired tradesmen, richly dressed, ignorant,
insolent, overbearing frumps, who - after filling themselves with good
things in their own luxurious homes - went flouncing into the
poverty-stricken dwellings of their poor `sisters’ and talked to them
of `religion’, lectured them about sobriety and thrift, and -
sometimes - gave them tickets for soup or orders for shillingsworths
of groceries or coal. Some of these overfed females - the wives of
tradesmen, for instance - belonged to the Organized Benevolence
Society, and engaged in this `work’ for the purpose of becoming
acquainted with people of superior social position - one of the
members was a colonel, and Sir Graball D’Encloseland - the Member of
Parliament for the borough - also belonged to the Society and
occasionally attended its meetings. Others took up district visiting
as a hobby; they had nothing to do, and being densely ignorant and of
inferior mentality, they had no desire or capacity for any
intellectual pursuit. So they took up this work for the pleasure of
playing the grand lady and the superior person at a very small
expense. Other of these visiting ladies were middle-aged, unmarried
women with small private incomes - some of them well-meaning,
compassionate, gentle creatures who did this work because they
sincerely desired to help others, and they knew of no better way.
These did not take much part in the business of the meetings; they
paid their subscriptions and helped to distribute the castoff
clothing and boots to those who needed them, and occasionally obtained
from the secretary an order for provisions or coal or bread for some
poverty-stricken family; but the poor, toil-worn women whom they
visited welcomed them more for their sisterly sympathy than for the
gifts they brought. Some of the visiting ladies were of this
character - but they were not many. They were as a few fragrant
flowers amidst a dense accumulation of noxious weeds. They were
examples of humility and kindness shining amidst a vile and loathsome
mass of hypocrisy, arrogance, and cant.
When the Chairman had opened the meeting, Mr Rushton moved a vote of
condolence with the relatives of the late secretary whom he eulogized
in the most extraordinary terms.
`The poor of Mugsborough had lost a kind and sympathetic friend’, `One
who had devoted his life to helping the needy’, and so on and so
forth. (As a matter of fact, most of the time of the defunct had been
passed
Comments (0)