The Global Elites Population Cull by Terence Smart (reading eggs books .txt) 📖
- Author: Terence Smart
Book online «The Global Elites Population Cull by Terence Smart (reading eggs books .txt) 📖». Author Terence Smart
He criticized the World Health Organization (WHO) and called them “a criminal medical organization” for creating fear and hysteria without, according to him, providing any verifiable scientific proof of a pandemic. He made these statements sharing his observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a webinar on COVID-19 on May 8, 2020, with the European Society of Pathology. It was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s key points.
It is no accident that the false-positive COVID-19 test rate reportedly approaches approximately 80%. The more positive COVID-19 tests they have in the test bank, the more people that they can report as COVID-19 deaths as they die.
Researchers Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter concluded that the RT-PCR test used to detect COVID-19 is so inaccurate that there may be between 22% and 78% false positives. But there is no way to be sure because there is no gold standard against which to verify the accuracy of the tests.
The evidence establishes beyond a shadow of a doubt that the PCR test used in COVID testing is scientifically “meaningless.” Brian Shilhavy from Health Impact News describes the PCR COVID test as “more akin to a religious belief, than anything based on science.”
How to Determine the False Positive Rate For COVID-19 Tests
The problem with COVID-19 testing is that they are testing for antibodies to the COVID-19, not the actual COVID-19. Some manufacturers have inflated the accuracy of their tests; none of the manufacturers’ published accuracy tests have been independently verified. It is generally accepted that the tests on the market today are 96% accurate. That might sound high, but it is a real problem. Here is why. Suppose that there is an infection rate of 1% for the entire population (which is what many have estimated to be the case for COVID-19). If you test 1,000 people for COVID-19 you would expect to find 10 people who test positive for COVID-19. But since the COVID-19 test is only 96% accurate, you would also find another 40 who test positive who do NOT in fact have COVID-19. That would be a total of 50 people who test positive.
Why is there so much controversy surrounding this pandemic? Why are experts in this area being censored if their views and research oppose that of the World Health Organization and our federal health regulatory agencies?
At the end of the day we have to ask ourselves, do we want to keep relying on corrupt organizations for important information about what’s happening? Why does humanity continue to trust organizations that have a lock track record of deceit, fraud and corruption?
Why do we believe that these organizations actually act in humanity’s best interests? Why are claims constantly made by these organizations, and simply believed, even when there is so much evidence that counters what we are getting from them?
Why do we continue to follow their instructions, obey and comply even when it’s not clear if these measures are for the best interests of the individual and the whole?
What is going on here?
IT’S A SCAM: After 48,299 COVID-19 Cases at 37 US Universities – Only 2 Hospitalizations and ZERO Deaths — More Likely to Be Killed By a Dog
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/scam-48299-covid-19-cases-37-us-universities-2-hospitalizations-zero-deaths-likely-killed-dog/
The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine develops, promotes and disseminates better evidence for healthcare - PCR positives: what do they mean?
Explanation of the experiment that shows whether a virus is still infective
Imagine that a virus enters your body. In a few months it might not do anything to you anymore. It might not do anything to your cells (virulence), and it might also lack the capacity to move into another person (infectivity) when you speak or sneeze. It is also possible that this virus simply never did anything to you and lacked infectivity from the very beginning. But traces of the virus might still be present in the person. In this case, the virus is present but inactive.
So how do you know if the virus is active? You do the PCR. If the virus is found in the person (PCR TRUE POSITIVE), that virus is injected into a culture cell. If by injecting that virus into culture cells, the virus is not able to reproduce in the cells, that virus cannot infect anybody any longer. This means that even if you are a PCR positive, you are no longer contagious, that is, the virus in you is no longer active.
Conclusion: A TRUE POSITIVE in PCR does not always mean that the person presents any danger to society. The virus cannot be transmitted when cell culture shows that the virus is not infective. Unfortunately relating PCR POSITIVE to infectivity is not easy if we consider the whole population. This would need 1) a model (correlation) that maps PCR POSITIVES and/or symptoms to infectivity as tested by viral culture or 2) viral culture for every individual case. See next.
Is there evidence that someone is infectious after PCR results?
Tom Jefferson et al. claim that after searching for the PCR to viral culture correlation no conclusion was found since time from collection and symptoms severity are needed for the correlation amongst other to find an appropriate model. We recall that currently they (governments) hardly look for symptoms in people. Positives are called PCR Positive asymptomatic if they present no symptoms.
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/pcr-positives-what-do-they-mean/
“The PCR test is best utilized as a diagnostic test to confirm the diagnosis of an infection based on clinical signs and symptoms. It certainly should not be used as a screening test when there is low prevalence of disease and should NEVER be used as the sole determinant in the diagnosis of a case. So, if any laboratory uses a PCR assay with that particular primer, they’re likely to get a lot of false positives! Politicians and Health Officials are basing their numbers of cases entirely on the results of these tests, which are not fit for this purpose. They are then using these figures to terrorise the population, and to justify decisions to impose local lockdowns, and increase nonsensical general restrictions which are having a massive impact on people’s lives and their health, and also on the economy, particularly hitting small businesses hard” – By Dr. Malcolm Kendrick - https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/09/28/false-positive-tests/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer: ‘Second Wave’ is Faked
Former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says “there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen.” The “Big Pharma” insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a “second wave” based on “new cases.”
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even “almost all” of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.
In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:
“We are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting…all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?”
Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple “yes.”
https://www.technocracy.news/former-chief-science-officer-for-pfizer-second-wave-is-faked/
Dr Mike Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology, a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology, has spent over 30 years leading new medicines research in the pharmaceuticals industry, and founded his own biotech company which he sold to the world’s biggest drug company Novartis in 2017.
He talks to James about his devastating paper What SAGE has Got Wrong (https://lockdownsceptics.org/what-sag...) in which he says that the Covid pandemic is over, that there will be no Second Wave, that we have already achieved herd immunity and that Sir Patrick Vallance, Britain’s Chief Scientific Adviser, is a liar and that the vaccine is more or less a waste of time. He doesn’t pull his punches.
Dr. Michael Yeadon an expert in immunology and epidemiology states that if you have had Covid-19 and recovered it is impossible to get Covid-19 again for many years. So no vaccine needed. He states government is lying about the Covid cases and so is government advisor Patrick Valance. Yeadon did his PhD with Valance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbMJoJ6i39k&feature=emb_logo
Julia Hartley-Brewer one of the few in the media telling the truth about Covid. 1% of the beds are taken in hospitals by Covid patients in London. 430 covid patients out of population of 9 million. Government says NHS is starting to get overwhelmed. In September Covid-19 was 19th in the list of all cause deaths in the U.K
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtxvrLdh9Bs
The Covid-19 Numbers Game: The “Second Wave” is Based on Fake Statistics
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-covid-19-numbers-game-the-second-wave-is-based-on-fake-statistics/5725003
In addition to the issue of false positive (which has been amply documented), a person with a bad cold or a flu, could be categorized as SARS-2 (Covid-19) positive, allegedly a dangerous virus.
What governments have done is to give the PCR positive test a single label namely Covid-19, when in fact the PCR positive test could be the result of other viruses including those pertaining to influenza or coronavirus common cold, which (according to the CDC) have similar symptoms to Covid-19.
Once the Covid-19 Positive label is established and accepted, it is then subject to numerous forms of manipulation, not to mention the falsification of death certificates.
These fake figures are then used to sustain the fear campaign and justify political decisions by corrupt national governments.
The public is led to believe that there is a “Second Wave” and the government is there to save lives through social distancing, the face mask, the closing down of economic activity, the paralysis of the national health system and the closing down of schools and universities.
There is a circular causal relationship. The more people get tested as a result of the fear campaign, the more PCR positive cases. …
It’s a Big Lie.
When the Lie becomes the Truth, there is no moving backwards.
By Michel Chossudovsky an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-covid-19-numbers-game-the-second-wave-is-based-on-fake-statistics/5725003
If this pandemic is real then why do they have to silence some doctors or experts if they give a different opinion about Covid-19? Most of the time people like to listen to their doctor and take advice from their Doctors about their wellbeing. So let’s listen to what the doctors are saying about this Covid-19 virus. You will not hear what these Doctors are saying about Covid-19 and the lockdowns on the mainstream media and that is because they are not in the narrative of what the MSM and governments want you to believe. Also the MSM are the same people and organizations that own the Big Pharmaceutical companies and they are scaremongering the public into accepting mandatory vaccinations, less freedoms and the ‘new normal’ way of living such as permanent social distancing and Covid-19 tracing apps on our
Comments (0)